Tweet
Cal DOJ admits firearms are safety devices
I'm in the market for secure containers. Given potential legal developments I thought it wise to see what's on the CA DOJ's approved list for safety containers.
While perusing the manufacturers, I found that Sig is on the list. Interesting.
When one searches for all models of safety containers Sig has on the list, this comes up: https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/certifie...acturer=151069
The DOJ's website clearly shows the Sig P229-40 as an approved safety device.
So... We're to trust our Government betters to know what's a proper safety container and what is not. And yet they can't keep container and firearm straight.
Taking a look at the CA DOJ's list of approved handguns, I do not see the Sig P229-40 listed. I see P229 models in 40 caliber, but none explicitly by that label.
Clearly some flunkie at DOJ went to the wrong list. Still makes me shake my head.
While perusing the manufacturers, I found that Sig is on the list. Interesting.
When one searches for all models of safety containers Sig has on the list, this comes up: https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/certifie...acturer=151069
The DOJ's website clearly shows the Sig P229-40 as an approved safety device.
So... We're to trust our Government betters to know what's a proper safety container and what is not. And yet they can't keep container and firearm straight.
Taking a look at the CA DOJ's list of approved handguns, I do not see the Sig P229-40 listed. I see P229 models in 40 caliber, but none explicitly by that label.
Clearly some flunkie at DOJ went to the wrong list. Still makes me shake my head.
Comment