I'm considering getting a single-action revolver but don't have any opinion regarding the two grip types commonly available. Given a choice, which grip type is preferred and "why/why not". TIA.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bisley vs. a "Regular" Single Action Grip
Collapse
X
-
For me, it depends on caliber.
I prefer the standard grips, but I've found that the Bisley types are easier on the hand when shooting major (.475, 45/70, .500) caliber SA's
-
What's the difference between them? I presume that Max's picture above includes both types but they all look the same to me.
JohnComment
-
Your eyes aren't fooling you, and neither am I - The two Rugers and the two Colt SAA's in my pic all have "standard" SA type grip frames. The Bisley type is longer and narrower.Comment
-
Okay, thanks! What about birdshead grips, how do they compare to the other two styles?
JohnComment
-
Be aware there are two sizes of 'conventional' single-action grips.
The full-size standard Ruger Blackhawks and Super Blackhawks have a grip that I find to be uncomfortable with heavy loads. These grips (as well as the guns themselves) are somewhat bigger/heftier than the traditional Colt SAA. IMHO these Ruger Blackhawk grips are just the wrong size, except for appearance. The "longer/taller" Bisley grip allows a more direct back-thrust for recoil and no edges cutting into your lower palm, etc.
In fact, I am converting a Super Blackhawk into a Bisley (a "Bishawk") as soon as I get off my arse and acquire a Bisley grip frame.
By contrast, the new Ruger 50th Anniv .357 (introduced 2005), the new "New Vaquero" (and, I think the very latest "Montado") have the new smaller frames and smaller SAA-sized gripframes. I find these easier to grasp/shoot, at least for the 38/357 stuff I shoot. (I am unsure if the new 50th Anniv 44Mag Flattop has the new smaller SAA-style grip, but I think so.)
As an aside, the New Vaquero in 45LC should not be used with "Ruger loads', which were designed for the bigger/sturdier frame & cylinder of the traditional big-assed Blackhawks.
A Birdshead grip is likely for style/concealability - I don't think you'd want to shoot 44Mag in them, etc. As I recall, they're typically 38/357 guns with 3+" bbls. They felt OK to me (never shot one).
Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA
CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
sigpic
No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.Comment
-
(former) Glock and 1911 Armorer; LEO (now retired)Comment
-
Thank you guys, for the SA education. Much appreciated! It's one (of many) missing from my collection, but is rapidly moving up my "gotta have" list.
JohnComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,864,471
Posts: 25,119,723
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,497
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5611 users online. 53 members and 5558 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.



Comment