Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Bisley vs. a "Regular" Single Action Grip

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • L-2
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 1331

    Bisley vs. a "Regular" Single Action Grip

    I'm considering getting a single-action revolver but don't have any opinion regarding the two grip types commonly available. Given a choice, which grip type is preferred and "why/why not". TIA.
    7
    Bisley
    0%
    4
    "Regular" single action type
    0%
    3
    (former) Glock and 1911 Armorer; LEO (now retired)
  • #2
    Max-the-Silent
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2007
    • 786

    For me, it depends on caliber.

    I prefer the standard grips, but I've found that the Bisley types are easier on the hand when shooting major (.475, 45/70, .500) caliber SA's

    Comment

    • #3
      jmlivingston
      Moderator Emeritus
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Oct 2005
      • 5095

      What's the difference between them? I presume that Max's picture above includes both types but they all look the same to me.

      John

      Comment

      • #4
        Max-the-Silent
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2007
        • 786

        Originally posted by jmlivingston
        What's the difference between them? I presume that Max's picture above includes both types but they all look the same to me.

        John
        Your eyes aren't fooling you, and neither am I - The two Rugers and the two Colt SAA's in my pic all have "standard" SA type grip frames. The Bisley type is longer and narrower.

        Comment

        • #5
          jmlivingston
          Moderator Emeritus
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Oct 2005
          • 5095

          Okay, thanks! What about birdshead grips, how do they compare to the other two styles?

          John

          Comment

          • #6
            bwiese
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Oct 2005
            • 27621

            Be aware there are two sizes of 'conventional' single-action grips.

            The full-size standard Ruger Blackhawks and Super Blackhawks have a grip that I find to be uncomfortable with heavy loads. These grips (as well as the guns themselves) are somewhat bigger/heftier than the traditional Colt SAA. IMHO these Ruger Blackhawk grips are just the wrong size, except for appearance. The "longer/taller" Bisley grip allows a more direct back-thrust for recoil and no edges cutting into your lower palm, etc.

            In fact, I am converting a Super Blackhawk into a Bisley (a "Bishawk") as soon as I get off my arse and acquire a Bisley grip frame.

            By contrast, the new Ruger 50th Anniv .357 (introduced 2005), the new "New Vaquero" (and, I think the very latest "Montado") have the new smaller frames and smaller SAA-sized gripframes. I find these easier to grasp/shoot, at least for the 38/357 stuff I shoot. (I am unsure if the new 50th Anniv 44Mag Flattop has the new smaller SAA-style grip, but I think so.)

            As an aside, the New Vaquero in 45LC should not be used with "Ruger loads', which were designed for the bigger/sturdier frame & cylinder of the traditional big-assed Blackhawks.

            A Birdshead grip is likely for style/concealability - I don't think you'd want to shoot 44Mag in them, etc. As I recall, they're typically 38/357 guns with 3+" bbls. They felt OK to me (never shot one).

            Bill Wiese
            San Jose, CA

            CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
            sigpic
            No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
            to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
            ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
            employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
            legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

            Comment

            • #7
              L-2
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2007
              • 1331

              Originally posted by jmlivingston
              What's the difference between them? I presume that Max's picture above includes both types but they all look the same to me.

              John

              BISLEY TYPE


              "REGULAR" (WESTERN) TYPE

              I believe different hammers are usually used, too.
              (former) Glock and 1911 Armorer; LEO (now retired)

              Comment

              • #8
                jmlivingston
                Moderator Emeritus
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Oct 2005
                • 5095

                Thank you guys, for the SA education. Much appreciated! It's one (of many) missing from my collection, but is rapidly moving up my "gotta have" list.

                John

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1