I recently purchased a rifle from a Calguns member. The rifle came with a cable lock. When I arrived at the FFL dealer he stated that the gun lock must have a receipt that states the lock was purchased 30 days or less. The gun lock looked almost new. The lock was the same as the ones I have used before (cable). I felt he was simply trying to sell me something. Can anyone clarify is this is true? I went to the DOJ website and I could not find that specific law.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New gun lock required on ppt
Collapse
X
-
Same experience here
A couple years ago, I had the same thing happen to me while I was doing a PPT on a rifle. I haven't done a PPT since then, so I don't know if they are still doing it. I was talking the the gun store owner and he said the cables were given to them from the police department. Then I was told I had to buy one. I asked him if I could bring in one of my own and was told no.
Is it a law, or was the FFL just trying to make a few bucks?Comment
-
30-day rule is law.I recently purchased a rifle from a Calguns member. The rifle came with a cable lock. When I arrived at the FFL dealer he stated that the gun lock must have a receipt that states the lock was purchased 30 days or less. The gun lock looked almost new. The lock was the same as the ones I have used before (cable). I felt he was simply trying to sell me something. Can anyone clarify is this is true? I went to the DOJ website and I could not find that specific law.
See the wiki -- http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/Bu...es.2C_and_LawsARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
-
It was. The OP didn't need to buy another. If it was not supplied with one, he could buy one from the shop, or present a lock with a receipt not more than 30 days old.12088.1. (a) All firearms sold or transferred in this state by a
licensed firearms dealer, including private transfers through a
dealer, and all firearms manufactured in this state, shall include or
be accompanied by a firearms safety device
The idea of the 30 day deal, I think, is that you can't use one lock to buy many guns. If the gun shows up with one, or the dealer hands you one (even a freebie from LE), that is a new lock, to be added to your pile. (Or handed back to the friendly dealer later). Lots of ways to satisfy the statute.Last edited by paul0660; 02-25-2012, 12:39 PM.*REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*Comment
-
its true. one of the FFL's I deal with told me that if I dont use the lock I can bring it back when ever I do a transfer and he will buy it back and sell it to me for the same price, that way we both stay legal.Comment
-
Unfortunately the lock issue per purchase is true; buy, show receipt, or show you got one from PD. Or... get a safe and complete the safe affidavit upon purchase. After a few purchases, you'll not only want a safe anyway, it's in your own best interest.-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
-
I recently purchased a rifle from a Calguns member. The rifle came with a cable lock. When I arrived at the FFL dealer he stated that the gun lock must have a receipt that states the lock was purchased 30 days or less. The gun lock looked almost new. The lock was the same as the ones I have used before (cable). I felt he was simply trying to sell me something. Can anyone clarify is this is true? I went to the DOJ website and I could not find that specific law.
DEFINITELY SOUNDS LIKE A TURNERS. IT'S RIDICULOUS, ONE OF THE REASONS WHY I REFUSE TO DO PPT'S THERE. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THE LOCK IS FACTORY NEW IN A SEALED PLASTIC BAG WITHIN THE CASE THEY'LL STILL MAKE YOU BUY THEIRS, ANYTHING TO MAKE A BUCK THESE DAYS. IN RECENT PPT'S I'VE DONE, THE SHOPS I FREQUENT DON'T MAKE YOU BUY ANOTHER AS LONG AS YOU HAVE YOUR OWN INCLUDED OR GUN SAFE INFORMATION, MUCH MORE SIMPLE AND STRAIGHTFORWARD."FORTUNE FAVORS THE BOLD"Comment
-
Every time this topic appears, I pop into the thread and post the link to the wiki article on locks -- http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/Bu...es.2C_and_LawsDEFINITELY SOUNDS LIKE A TURNERS. IT'S RIDICULOUS, ONE OF THE REASONS WHY I REFUSE TO DO PPT'S THERE. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THE LOCK IS FACTORY NEW IN A SEALED PLASTIC BAG WITHIN THE CASE THEY'LL STILL MAKE YOU BUY THEIRS, ANYTHING TO MAKE A BUCK THESE DAYS. IN RECENT PPT'S I'VE DONE, THE SHOPS I FREQUENT DON'T MAKE YOU BUY ANOTHER AS LONG AS YOU HAVE YOUR OWN INCLUDED OR GUN SAFE INFORMATION, MUCH MORE SIMPLE AND STRAIGHTFORWARD.
And invariably, after that, there are a few posts that suggest that the posters have not followed the link.
C'mon, folks!
That is the single best explanation of locks, safes, and both California and Federal law on those things you can find anywhere.ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
-
But it would be better, bordering on perfect, if shall include orThat is the single best explanation of locks, safes, and both California and Federal law on those things you can find anywhere.
be accompanied by a firearms safety device were highlighted. I think that there is a disconnect between the raw code and the following 30 day, guns safe exemption etc. exceptions.
Turner relies on this confuseion to sell locks. So does Bullseye.*REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*Comment
-
But it would be better, bordering on perfect, if shall include or
be accompanied by a firearms safety device were highlighted. I think that there is a disconnect between the raw code and the following 30 day, guns safe exemption etc. exceptions.
Turner relies on this confuseion to sell locks. So does Bullseye.

PAUL 0660 - BRAVO! LIKE I SAID ANYTHING TO MAKE A BUCK..."FORTUNE FAVORS THE BOLD"Comment
-
See revisions - always can use improvements - but the part that I was actually referring to was the persistent 'use the safe' when BATFE incompetence, amply explained at the wiki, says that no longer works for handguns.ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,866,474
Posts: 25,144,591
Members: 357,024
Active Members: 4,400
Welcome to our newest member, Wynn52.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 24929 users online. 118 members and 24811 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment