Everyone knows that .22LR is cheap fun but it's also been mentioned as a good way to practice. But with the reduced recoil and lack of boom factor, I question if it's an effective tool only for a complete beginner getting their toes wet in the world of shooting.
As an example please see the target below from my last session. The top target is 5.56 from my AR and the lower one is from my Remy 700 .308 both shot from 100yds. Now I'm obviously not a superior marksman having both guns for about 2 months but I'm wondering if I'd be better off to continue practicing with my current rifles at much greater expense or if a 10/22 would be a sound practicing investment. I'm afraid I might fall asleep at the bench shooting .22 with my previous experience with a ruger 22 pistol being underwhelming while shooting .40S&W and .45ACP. What's your take?
As an example please see the target below from my last session. The top target is 5.56 from my AR and the lower one is from my Remy 700 .308 both shot from 100yds. Now I'm obviously not a superior marksman having both guns for about 2 months but I'm wondering if I'd be better off to continue practicing with my current rifles at much greater expense or if a 10/22 would be a sound practicing investment. I'm afraid I might fall asleep at the bench shooting .22 with my previous experience with a ruger 22 pistol being underwhelming while shooting .40S&W and .45ACP. What's your take?




Comment