I looked into this issue after I was next to guy with huge magnum pistol at outdoor range. The guy turned my ears into raw meat... All the studies done by hearing experts indicate you should double up. Reason being muff alone in real world will not fit properly due to things like glasses etc.
Not to be a pessimist but there really is no adequate protection to sustained high impact noise. Reason being is noise vibrates to inner ear through bone and tissue of skull, neck, and jaw, and no muffs or ear plugs will prevent sound waves from impacting the bone and tissue of the those areas and reaching the inner ear. Doubling up does not prevent high frequency noise from reaching inner ear. In fact using both mufflers and ear plugs together will only add about three points to the total NRR rating.
Also, another factor is exposure to high impact noise over time. Meaning if you are with a large group of shooters all firing high caliber weapons your risk of hearing damage goes up the longer you remain in that environment regardless of your level of hearing protection. Meaning sustained exposure to noise equals hearing loss. All the standards are based on hours of exposure to noise and potential damage.
The only way to really protect your hearing is to limit the time and frequency of exposure to high impact type noise even with protection. That means spending less time at indoor ranges for sure, and in general being aware that there is a cost for recreational shooting indoor or outdoor.
The real solution is to allow shooters in California to have the same type of protection that hunters have in Europe in the form of firearm silencers or noise reducers to protect the hearing and health of the shooter, and those in the same area as the shooter. The California model seems to be to make firearms so unpleasant and hazardous that no sane person will use them except at great cost and in extreme situations.
The best technology to prevent hearing loss is to prevent high impact noise at the source by modifying the barrel with a silencer. Unfortunately California and the Federal Government are stuck in the past on this issue and needlessly endangering the hearing of recreational shooters and bystanders.
Protecting the hearing of gun owners and others should be a gun rights issue just as important as open carry and other issues, as good hearing is an import quality of life issue.
Not to be a pessimist but there really is no adequate protection to sustained high impact noise. Reason being is noise vibrates to inner ear through bone and tissue of skull, neck, and jaw, and no muffs or ear plugs will prevent sound waves from impacting the bone and tissue of the those areas and reaching the inner ear. Doubling up does not prevent high frequency noise from reaching inner ear. In fact using both mufflers and ear plugs together will only add about three points to the total NRR rating.
Also, another factor is exposure to high impact noise over time. Meaning if you are with a large group of shooters all firing high caliber weapons your risk of hearing damage goes up the longer you remain in that environment regardless of your level of hearing protection. Meaning sustained exposure to noise equals hearing loss. All the standards are based on hours of exposure to noise and potential damage.
The only way to really protect your hearing is to limit the time and frequency of exposure to high impact type noise even with protection. That means spending less time at indoor ranges for sure, and in general being aware that there is a cost for recreational shooting indoor or outdoor.
The real solution is to allow shooters in California to have the same type of protection that hunters have in Europe in the form of firearm silencers or noise reducers to protect the hearing and health of the shooter, and those in the same area as the shooter. The California model seems to be to make firearms so unpleasant and hazardous that no sane person will use them except at great cost and in extreme situations.
The best technology to prevent hearing loss is to prevent high impact noise at the source by modifying the barrel with a silencer. Unfortunately California and the Federal Government are stuck in the past on this issue and needlessly endangering the hearing of recreational shooters and bystanders.
Protecting the hearing of gun owners and others should be a gun rights issue just as important as open carry and other issues, as good hearing is an import quality of life issue.



I watch a particular NFA video pretty frequently because of the silencers shot in it haha. I started going to this indoor range when a local outdoor one flooded months ago and have kept going since. I prefer outdoor to indoor, most definitely, but that indoor is pretty convenient. Luckily, I shoot pretty exclusively on the weekdays. I usually take my .22lr rifle so I do usually stay there until the 2 hours are up. Think I'm going to go buy a bag of Howard Leight ear plugs.



Comment