Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Conversation with a customer

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FortCourageArmory
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2007
    • 1001

    Conversation with a customer

    I had a regular come in this morning. We've been talking about AR-15 builds and I thought he had been bitten by the bug. I asked him how the project was progressing and he frowned and told me it was on the back burner. When I asked why, he told me he had been talking to his brother-in-law (on Culver City PD) who told him to drop it. The BIL told him he would most probably be arrested, have his gun confiscated and suffer lots of monetary damage. That disappoints me that a member of law enforcement would be so ignorant of the law to advise him this way. Makes you want to find the BIL and put a current copy of the Penal Code in his hands and force him to read it.
    sigpicNRA Life Member
    Tim & the gang
    Fort Courage Armory
    1518-B Los Angeles Avenue
    Simi Valley, CA 93065
    (805) 526-6563
    www.fortcouragearmory.com
  • #2
    1911 in 916
    Member
    • May 2007
    • 332

    It's another incident of an idiot talking out his ***. He's probably the same pd that gives people tickets for 2 miles over the speed limit.

    Comment

    • #3
      Shane916
      Calguns Addict
      • Feb 2006
      • 5004

      Originally posted by 1911 in 916
      It's another incident of an idiot talking out his ***. He's probably the same pd that gives people tickets for 2 miles over the speed limit.
      Or maybe he is concerned for his brother in laws well being

      Comment

      • #4
        FreshTapCoke
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2005
        • 900

        Originally posted by Shane916
        Or maybe he is concerned for his brother in laws well being
        Hey, it's not likely anyones been wrongly arrested or put in jail for legal posession of an off list lower, right? =)
        Originally posted by Noble Cause
        Can you imagine Patrick Henry, the "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" guy, in today's world, whining about "not joining the NRA because of junk mail" ?!

        Comment

        • #5
          VeryCoolCat
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Feb 2006
          • 11275

          The BIL told him he would most probably be arrested, have his gun confiscated and suffer lots of monetary damage.
          uhhh... its true though. You can be arrested, have your gun confiscated, and suffer a lot of monetary damage.

          Look at BWO.

          All of us risk that by going to the range.
          Originally posted by Kestryll
          The volume of blood necessary to achieve erection would cause you to either pass out or if you didn't and managed to maintain an erection you would likely die from lack of oxygen to the heart and brain.
          Originally posted by ivanimal
          Just be glad you are not his next door neighbor. I am sure there are "good tunes" flowing out the window. I am imagining a cop car pulling up at 1:30 AM asking "Are you having a party?" and Bundo sayin "Nope just me and the BG's"

          Comment

          • #6
            tankerman
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Mar 2006
            • 24240

            Originally posted by Shane916
            Or maybe he is concerned for his brother in laws well being
            TOOL

            Comment

            • #7
              rkt88edmo
              Reptile&Samurai Moderator
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Dec 2002
              • 10058

              Originally posted by tankerman
              TOOL
              That looks like a personal insult. Let's keep it civil please.
              If it was a snake, it would have bit me.
              Use the goog to search calguns

              Comment

              • #8
                eta34
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2006
                • 2432

                Once again, we in the gun community resort to name calling and insults. As I have proposed before, until you have personally helped the LEO community understand the current OLL situation, you shouldn't complain. The fact is, most LEO don't know about this and rely on the little firearms law they were given in the academy. Is it right that they (we) don't know the law? Of course not. However, you can whine and complain and see no change, or make a difference yourself.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Spitfire75
                  Member
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 285

                  Hmmm, then that Culver City cop is going to just LOVE my condo in Culver City!
                  "If they want to live in the Stone Ages, we can surely send them back there."
                  - Mr. Burns
                  Spitfire75

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    rg_1111@yahoo.com
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 5721

                    Well, its understandable the LEO is confused. Heck the DOJ is even confused about some of the laws they wrote.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      pnkssbtz
                      Veteran Member
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 3555

                      Originally posted by eta34
                      Once again, we in the gun community resort to name calling and insults. As I have proposed before, until you have personally helped the LEO community understand the current OLL situation, you shouldn't complain. The fact is, most LEO don't know about this and rely on the little firearms law they were given in the academy. Is it right that they (we) don't know the law? Of course not. However, you can whine and complain and see no change, or make a difference yourself.
                      I beg to disagree. I think the fact that the BIL is a LEO is only a tertiary issue.

                      The issue as I read it (and I could be the only one reading it this way) is that his customer was instructed by his customers BIL to stop working on this project because it was (implied) illegal.

                      The BIL spoke with authority on the matter, and is in a position to theoretically be well informed on CA AW laws.

                      The occupation of the BIL could of been an attorney, DA, DA assistant, Judge, other firearm enthusiast, whatever.


                      The fact that the information, while true in a literal sense, is completely false in the implied undertones that it conveyed combined with the supposed familiarity that the BIL theoretically has with regards to AW laws (which lend credence to his position of authority) is what I believe has people upset.



                      As to not being allowed to complain until one "personally helped the LEO community understand the current OLL situation", how about when I called up the Orange County PD and spoke to a Lieutenant in regards to CA Knife Laws?

                      The LEO was very very familiar with the CA knife laws. And I believe was intentionally leaving out the 2nd to 4th lines of 653k to misrepresent the legalities of the "switch blades" he was arresting people for possession of.

                      The LEO was very resistant to my attempts to discuss the technicalities of a "detent or other mechanism that provides resistance that must be overcome in opening the blade, or that biases the blade back toward its closed position."

                      The LEO claimed to have no knowledge of an assisted opening knife, but could describe in at least 2 different ways a bali-song and a gravity knife and their differences.

                      Clearly I could not change the mind of an LEO who's defense to my questions and discussion was "I've never heard of an assisted opening knife."


                      So how exactly is "Joe the Average Citizen" supposed to sway the minds of a LEO department without legal representation or a higher-up mandating a change of the unwritten policy?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        eta34
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2006
                        • 2432

                        Look, I am not saying you will be successful. I believe that you tried to do your best to educate us. Unfortunately, there are many in our profession who already know everything, so when the "average civilian" tells them what to do, they automatically dismiss it.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          metalhead357
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Jan 2006
                          • 5546

                          Originally posted by rg_1111@yahoo.com
                          Well, its understandable the LEO is confused. Heck the DOJ is even confused about some of the laws they wrote.

                          DOJ is not confused....but that is another thread in itself....but I'll 'grant' ya maybe the cop is as the zainy laws we got here is 'nuff to make a bookworm legal gouge out his eyes...........
                          I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered....
                          I am not a number! I am a free man

                          1.)All humanity would be better off if Stoooopid hurt.
                          2.)Why is it that if guns are sooooo unsafe that you're 9 times more likely to die at the hands of your doctor?
                          3.)Remember...Buy it cheap & stack it deep

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            tyrist
                            Veteran Member
                            • Jun 2007
                            • 4564

                            pnkssbtz for future referance do not inquire from lieutenants about laws most of them have been pushing too much paper. Talk to patrol officers they are the ones who make the call.

                            I once had an arguement with one about a switch blade only being a misdeamenor and not considered a ballistic knife which by the definition of ballistic means the blade is propelled from the handle

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              pnkssbtz
                              Veteran Member
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 3555

                              Originally posted by eta34
                              Look, I am not saying you will be successful. I believe that you tried to do your best to educate us. Unfortunately, there are many in our profession who already know everything, so when the "average civilian" tells them what to do, they automatically dismiss it.
                              True, this could be extended to any profession where there is an unspoken understanding that the people of that profession are well informed on a particular subject, but the person in particular is not.

                              Computer tech support is a prime example... "What do you mean delete winsock? NO. GO AWAY I WANT A SUPERVISOR!"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1