In light of the WASHPO article about the "hidden life of guns" and the new ATF regs about reporting two or more purchases of centerfire rifles with detachable magazines, I was wondering if DOJ/ATF co-ordinates with media outlets to push their positions?
I have been seeing more articles and ads for articles (on yahoo this morning) about the "shocking truth about violence in mexico" namely, that it is caused by US gun dealers etc..
This seems like too much of a coincidence. The newspapers prep the public, the Feds come up with new regs, and then the media explains why its a good idea.
I would think there would be some journalistic conflict of ethics here. I wonder if the link can be proven.
This is similar to what W. R. Hearst used to do when he had a newspaper monopoly. Use the media to create public opinion. Of course he was a private citizen.
This instance would involve the government. The whole thing stinks...
Am i incredibly paranoid or incredibly nieve?
I have been seeing more articles and ads for articles (on yahoo this morning) about the "shocking truth about violence in mexico" namely, that it is caused by US gun dealers etc..
This seems like too much of a coincidence. The newspapers prep the public, the Feds come up with new regs, and then the media explains why its a good idea.
I would think there would be some journalistic conflict of ethics here. I wonder if the link can be proven.
This is similar to what W. R. Hearst used to do when he had a newspaper monopoly. Use the media to create public opinion. Of course he was a private citizen.
This instance would involve the government. The whole thing stinks...
Am i incredibly paranoid or incredibly nieve?

Comment