In a lot of the reading that I've done, it always seems that writers prefer rifles to pistols, in some cases, even when talking about close quarters kind of stuff. This idea is probably best embodied in the comment, loosely paraphrased, "the only purpose for a pistol is to fight your way back to your rifle."
In spite of the prevalence of this idea, I've never really seen the reason(s) for it explained. Why is a rifle considered superior? Is it the range, the power? Can someone explain it to me or point me at some discussion of the "theory" behind the idea?
In spite of the prevalence of this idea, I've never really seen the reason(s) for it explained. Why is a rifle considered superior? Is it the range, the power? Can someone explain it to me or point me at some discussion of the "theory" behind the idea?



Comment