Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

LAPD false arrest of UOCer / details now made public

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Liberty1
    Calguns Addict
    • Apr 2007
    • 5541

    LAPD false arrest of UOCer / details now made public



    ...my legal counsel advises against giving their real names YET. So for now, and for purposes of this posting, I'll just assign them names which fit their physical appearance. Fair enough?

    The first two officers showed up in a fully marked LAPD cruiser. The car comes to a stop, and without bothering to pull to the curb, officers OJ and Sawed-off exit the car, walking in my direction. Aware of this, and anticipating a LEO encounter, I activate the audio recording function on my phone and set it on the table next to me. The 2 officers stop about 12' short of where I'm sitting. With their hands on their guns (also known as brandishing), they ask me to come over and talk to them for a second. The moment I get up, they both bark at me to put my hands on my head. I comply and the cuffs go on immediately, followed by OJ pulling my weapon from it's holster. I ask him why I'm in handcuffs when I've done nothing wrong.

    OJ: "We got a call of a man with a gun."

    MH: "Well there's nothing illegal about that."

    OJ: "Yeah I understand that. I know who you are. We're just gonna verify everything and make sure it's not loaded."

    MH: "Do you have reason to believe I've done something wrong?"

    OJ: "I understand you're trying to bait me....."

    MH: "I'm not trying to bait you, I'm just asking a question."

    The audio gets a little bit lousy here for maybe 15 seconds. They move me to a bench nearby, and my wife bravely walks up and sets my phone down next to me because my dumb *** left it on the table. She then moves back a few feet and continues filming with her cellphone cam. OJ asks her to move further away.

    MH: "She's with me."

    OJ: "I understand that."

    He sure says that alot for a guy who will likely claim much ignorance on this incident later on.

    MH: "This camera is here , basically, just to keep you honest."

    OJ: "I been on the job 23 years. I'm not gonna do anything wrong to you, O.K.?"

    MH: "You've already DONE something wrong to me."

    OJ: "Well you know what? Again, to verify and make sure everything's all Kosher, if everything's all good to go, you'll get your weapon back. No problem sir, alright?"

    As of this posting, I haven't gotten it back. But hey, maybe he meant to add....."months later."

    OJ: "But for my safe- my partner's safety, right, we're in here dealing with you, we don't need other parties standing by. She can record. I'm not stopping her from recording here. Am I?.......Do you have any I.D. on you sir?"

    MH: "No."

    OJ: "You got an I.D. to verify who you are?"

    MH: "No."

    Sawed-off: "What's your last name sir?"

    MH: "I really don't feel like giving that information out."

    OJ asks Sawed-off "Who's responding?" and then engages in some police jargon with some other party on the radio for a moment. I will also point out here that at this point I've figured out that officer OJ is a liar. He told me earlier on that he knew who I was, but is now demanding that I identify myself. WTF?

    OJ: "Who does the weapon belong to?"

    MH: "Me."

    OJ: "O.K. do you have I.D.?"

    This shyte is getting old. Either he's deaf, or is implying I'm as big a liar as himself.

    MH: "No."

    OJ: "O.K. so how can we verify who you are then? To run the gun and verify it's your weapon....."

    MH: "Do you have a reason to believe I'm not who I said I am?"

    Alright this doesn't make sense, but I was angry and nervous. Besides, he already knows who I am, right?

    OJ: "But we don't even know who you are."

    MH: "You know who I am. I haven't done anything wrong."

    OJ: "Right now you're being detained for investigation."

    MH: "For what?"

    OJ: "Hmm?"

    MH: "Into what crime?"

    OJ: "Right now you have a gun, uh, like I said, I know you're a security guard, right?"

    MH: "I'm not a security guard. And again, this is not a crime."

    OJ: "You still have to have I.D. on you, to verify who you are."

    MH: "No I don't."

    OJ: "O.K., alright, so you're not gonna tell us your last name or anything?"

    Silence

    OJ: "You understand? People call saying a man's here with a gun, at the coffee shop, so that's why we're here."

    A little fuzzy on the audio here for just a sec, but a sentence ending with "....describing you to a tee, so that's why we're here."

    MH: "When you get a moment, can I get your business card?"

    OJ: "Sure, I'll give you a business card."

    Sawed-off puts one in my pocket. Long silence.

    OJ: "Of course, you understand, as soon as we get called, we HAVE to investigate."

    More unintelligible crap and something about a call they'd had some other time about some guy with a rifle.

    OJ: "Again, if you're not gonna give us your information, we gotta investigate who you are. What if we run the gun and it comes back to someone else? And you gotta clear your name? Like I said, you cooperate with us, in and out."

    Does anyone here read Stephen King? Remember the sheriff who didn't make any sense in Desperation??

    OJ makes a quick phone call to inquire "who's on shift tonight". I suspect this is to figure out if it's someone who'll help him lie, as it seems he's trying to up the ante in his percieved "pissing contest". Another car shows up and out steps a large, unpleasant looking short-haired woman. She speaks with Sawed-off for a minute and then comes over to where they have me sitting.

    Militia Etheridge: "How ya' doin' sir? Happy New Year."

    MH: " Happy New Year."

    To be honest, I'd have wished her a much lousier year, had I known that she too was trying to hose me.

    Militia: "What's goin on today?"

    MH: "Ask these two."

    Militia: "No I'm asking you, I'm not asking them. All I know is we got a radio call of a man with a gun, and apparently you had a gun on you. Not loaded, I understand. Now where were you when the officers got here? In a car?"

    MH: "No, the coffee shop."

    Militia: "O.K. do you understand how people would percieve that? They look over, they see a guy- especially in these times, you know, newspapers with shootings and all this stuff. Can you see how that could be percieved as a threat? Some guy they don't know sitting in a coffee shop with a gun on his side?"

    After this barrage of finger-wagging drivel, I simply stopped talking altogether. (I think I already spoke too much at that point anyways.) I mean, what could I possibly say to her? Hell, she sounded just like that lying *** officer OJ! I decided that anything I would've/could've said would be at least useless, or at most very unkind to this wildebeast of a woman. So I shut up.

    Militia: "Hello?!"

    Silence

    Militia: "Do you understand how that could be percieved as a threat? They have somebody they don't know at a business, with a gun on their side. And we've got people out here getting shot, murdered, killed, whatever. They don't know who you are, sir. We're here because we got called here, O.K?.......... Are you refusing to answer my question? O.K., so you're gonna, uh, so basically you're uh, interfering with this investigation. 'Cause I'm telling you, you need to either cooperate or we're gonna take you to the station! O.K. is that what you choose to do?

    Militia: (to the other officers) "O.K. we'll take him for 148."

    Militia: "You're under arrest sir for interfering with my officers' investigation."

    OJ: "Is this your phone sir?"

    MH: "Yep."

    OJ: "I'm gonna place it in your pockets right now." (puts it in my pocket) "Stand up."

    MH: "Which station will I be taken to?"

    Sawed-off: "Initially you'll be going to Harbor Station."

    MH: (to my wife) "I'll be at Harbor Division."

    Wife: (to LEOs) "What are the charges?"

    Militia: "Interfering."

    OJ: "148PC"

    (...later during booking...)

    Gordon: "As of right now you're being detained for interfering with a police investigation, and refusing to answer the officer's identification. Also I'll have to check on the fact that, if you have a magazine in the gunwell of the gun, even if it's empty I think that's illegal. You can have an empty weapon but you can't have a magazine placed in there. I'll have to research that and find out. So now do you understand?"

    (...tick tock...)

    I sit in there for what I estimate to be about 2 hours. (They took my watch) OJ comes back and says he's taking me down the hall for booking. I ask him what they're charging me with and he says 12025.

    Yes, apparently now he has 3 witnesses who will swear they "saw me carrying concealed". Not sure how that one works, but I'm guessing he doesn't either. I tell him in polite words that he knows as well as I do that he's full of shyte. Seems he IS familiar with the 5A however, because he opted to shut his lying, cowardly mouth at this point.

    They booked me for 12025...
    False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
    -- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/
  • #2
    POLICESTATE
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Apr 2009
    • 18185

    Militia Etheridge

    -POLICESTATE,
    In the name of the State, and of the School, and of the Infallible Science


    sigpic


    Government Official Lies
    . F r e e d o m . D i e s .

    Comment

    • #3
      Maestro Pistolero
      Veteran Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 3897

      I'm gonna run out of popcorn on this one. I don't know where to begin. Exercising 5th amendment rights is somehow interfering with an investigation? This had better be costly. I hope the OP retires from the proceeds. Well played, sir. False arrest indeed.
      www.christopherjhoffman.com

      The Second Amendment is the one right that is so fundamental that the inability to exercise it, should the need arise, would render all other rights null and void. Dead people have no rights.
      Magna est veritas et praevalebit

      Comment

      • #4
        stan
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2008
        • 1322

        wow thats bad. they start an investigation despite admitting having no belief a crime is being committed in the presence or otherwise. and then they book him for interfering with said investigation.
        SCALIA: WTF are you talking about? We can incorporate it under due process. I hate due process and I even think that.
        GURA: Uhhh
        SCALIA: Are you trying to get a job at a law school?
        GURA: ....Oh s***
        SCALIA: SERIOUSLY STFU IF WE USE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES THESE F***OS WILL LEGITIMIZE EVERYTHING STFU STFU STFU
        GURA: But you hate due process
        SCALIA: I LIKE IT NOW

        Comment

        • #5
          stan
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2008
          • 1322

          Originally posted by Maestro Pistolero
          I'm gonna run out of popcorn on this one. I don't know where to begin. Exercising 5th amendment rights is somehow interfering with an investigation? This had better be costly. I hope the OP retires from the proceeds. Well played, sir. False arrest indeed.
          reminds me of when my stag was seized. first it was that he thought it was an AW. then it was that he thought it was stolen (because it WASNT REGISTERED LOL). then it was i forget what. the story will change to fit what works as long as possible. nobody likes being wrong
          SCALIA: WTF are you talking about? We can incorporate it under due process. I hate due process and I even think that.
          GURA: Uhhh
          SCALIA: Are you trying to get a job at a law school?
          GURA: ....Oh s***
          SCALIA: SERIOUSLY STFU IF WE USE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES THESE F***OS WILL LEGITIMIZE EVERYTHING STFU STFU STFU
          GURA: But you hate due process
          SCALIA: I LIKE IT NOW

          Comment

          • #6
            Liberty1
            Calguns Addict
            • Apr 2007
            • 5541

            Originally posted by stan
            wow thats bad. they start an investigation despite admitting having no belief a crime is being committed in the presence or otherwise. and then they book him for interfering with said investigation.
            Some where along the process they realize thier mistakes and drag out old 12025 felony (hope he gets his DNA sample back). I guess they could say the gun was concealed by the holster... not.
            Last edited by Liberty1; 02-24-2010, 11:44 PM.
            False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
            -- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/

            Comment

            • #7
              gunsmith
              Senior Member
              • May 2004
              • 2028

              good luck

              UOC'ers have got to be well prepared and have multiple cameras/witnesses
              NRA Life Member

              Comment

              • #8
                wkd4496
                Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 439

                Originally posted by stan
                reminds me of when my stag was seized. first it was that he thought it was an AW. then it was that he thought it was stolen (because it WASNT REGISTERED LOL). then it was i forget what. the story will change to fit what works as long as possible. nobody likes being wrong
                AND THAT reminds me of when I was detained because the officer thought it was an AW and it wasnt registered. Then he told me that "All semi-automatics need to be registered."
                "Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire."

                Comment

                • #9
                  Scratch705
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • May 2009
                  • 12530

                  so how long before we get to see the video of "oj and crew" being idiots on youtube? haha
                  Originally posted by leelaw
                  Because -ohmigosh- they can add their opinions, too?
                  Originally posted by SoCalSig1911
                  Preppers canceled my order this afternoon because I called them a disgrace... Not ordering from those clowns again.
                  Originally posted by PrepperGunShop
                  Truthfully, we cancelled your order because of your lack of civility and your threats ... What is a problem is when you threaten my customer service team and make demands instead of being civil. Plain and simple just don't be an a**hole (where you told us to shove it).

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    cmth
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 519

                    I was wondering which penal code "contempt of cop" fell under. Apparently it's 148 and 12025. I hope Mike takes the LAPD to the cleaners like the bloke in New Mexico did.
                    Libertas aut Mors

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Liberty1
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 5541

                      Originally posted by cmth
                      I was wondering which penal code "contempt of cop" fell under. Apparently it's 148 and 12025. I hope Mike takes the LAPD to the cleaners like the bloke in New Mexico did.
                      The NM bloke gave that dept. a break (atty fees only and droped the suit). LAPD is not known for giving LACs a break. We'll see what comes from this...
                      False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
                      -- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Brianguy
                        Veteran Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 3836

                        Sounds like someone didn't want to admit they were wrong. What a couple of jokers. Good luck with your case.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Mstrty
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 2443

                          Wheres the video We need pictures!!!!
                          ~ ~

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Fate
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Apr 2006
                            • 9545

                            sigpic "On bended knee is no way to be free." - Eddie Vedder, "Guaranteed"

                            "Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks." -Thomas Jefferson
                            , in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr dated August 19, 1785

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Mendo223
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 1536

                              what was so hard abuot just giving him your ID to verify the gun is yours, and now everyone can go home?

                              either way, good luck taking them to court.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1