I have been debating the purchase of a Glock 9mm for awhile. I was fairly convinced that a 19 would be my best choice. I figured the 10 round limit in CA kind of negated the advantage of a 17. I do not have large hands.
A friend of mine is LEO and a 'Glock Lover'. He carries a 35 (.40S&W) on duty.
My friend suggested that I look at the 34 (9mm brother of 35) because the longer barrel is a huge advantage. Personally, I thought 4" vs 5" was not that major.
This is mostly a range and HD gun. I do not carry. Comfort and accuracy is more important than size.
I know we have a lot of Glock fans on this board. Have any of you shot all 3 extensively?
If you were in my shoes, would you choose the 17, 19, or 34?
BTW, this is my first 'plastic' gun. All of my previous experience is metal guns, except for a few 'loaner' opportunities many years ago.
Thank you.
A friend of mine is LEO and a 'Glock Lover'. He carries a 35 (.40S&W) on duty.
My friend suggested that I look at the 34 (9mm brother of 35) because the longer barrel is a huge advantage. Personally, I thought 4" vs 5" was not that major.
This is mostly a range and HD gun. I do not carry. Comfort and accuracy is more important than size.
I know we have a lot of Glock fans on this board. Have any of you shot all 3 extensively?
If you were in my shoes, would you choose the 17, 19, or 34?
BTW, this is my first 'plastic' gun. All of my previous experience is metal guns, except for a few 'loaner' opportunities many years ago.
Thank you.
Comment