So, I've been thinking a lot about the california suppressor laws, and it made me start to wonder about this.
I understand that a seperate silencer that attaches to an existing firearm and lessens its report is clearly defined and untouchable in California (as no one can get that tax stamp), but what about integral suppressors (I'm thinking of the .22 pistols or 10/22's that have a full custom barrel)?
The reason it seems this could get around it is say you have a 10/22 with a 16" barrell. If you added a 28" custom bull barrel or something allong those lines, I'm sure that it would reduce the report in measurable decibels. This is not illegal, but it does "supress" the sound from the guns factory conditions.
If the argument is that an integratted supressed barrel is aftermarket, what if a company made a new gun that ONLY came with such a barrel. Would it then be illegal, because it is "too quiet"?
I hope this makes sense, forgive me for rambling, I am just working the graveyard, and pondering asinine legislature...
I understand that a seperate silencer that attaches to an existing firearm and lessens its report is clearly defined and untouchable in California (as no one can get that tax stamp), but what about integral suppressors (I'm thinking of the .22 pistols or 10/22's that have a full custom barrel)?
The reason it seems this could get around it is say you have a 10/22 with a 16" barrell. If you added a 28" custom bull barrel or something allong those lines, I'm sure that it would reduce the report in measurable decibels. This is not illegal, but it does "supress" the sound from the guns factory conditions.
If the argument is that an integratted supressed barrel is aftermarket, what if a company made a new gun that ONLY came with such a barrel. Would it then be illegal, because it is "too quiet"?
I hope this makes sense, forgive me for rambling, I am just working the graveyard, and pondering asinine legislature...

Comment