Nutnfancy on AB962

[Nachoman]

I watch nutn as well although he's a bit too verbose for me, and I generally have to jump ahead in his videos. Although I can't fault him for that, that's how these video blogs generally get started... folks like the chance to just sit and ramble about their favorite subjects. Some blogs take off like his has, some remain viewerless.

Generally though, I agree with his philosophies, especially with regards to choosing a gun for CCW.

[echang86]

Definitely appreciate what he's doing.


Just trying to play devil's advocate, what would some positive things AB962 could bring? Cause I can't come up with any at all....

[aermotor]

Great vid, he's in it for all of us as a nation, he's not in it for himself. If you've ever heard him talk about Australia and the UK gun laws, you know what I mean. We cannot let this happen, not here in the land of the free.

When will the Gov. understand that any of these laws DO NOT protect us citizens but only put us in far greater danger. Criminals are going to get their hands on illegal guns/ammo no matter what the laws say, so all this does it penalize the law abiding citizens. It's gross. This country needs a severe overhauling. Revolutionary overhauling.

[Joe]

I have a new respect for nutnfancy.

[Chk Chk Boom]

Definitely appreciate what he's doing.


Just trying to play devil's advocate, what would some positive things AB962 could bring? Cause I can't come up with any at all....

To play devil's advocate... I suppose greater availability of ammo for people out of state to buy online?

[M9Man]

Nutnfancy is the man oohrah!

[heycorey]

I read this editorial in the Sacramento Bee newspaper this morning; a story about the great success of a Sacramento ordinance requiring fingerprinting to buy ammo in the city ... and therefore why AB962 should be enacted for the state.

The thing that stood out for me when reading the editorial was a reference to a woman - a convicted felon - who'd been arrested (because of her thumbprint) after buying ammo. This case was apparently provided as proof to the positive affect of this very effective law in Sacramento.

The editor goes on to indicate that the convicted felon was found to be in possession of three "semiautomatic weapons", more than an ounce of crystal meth and 900 Ecstasy pills. The writer never mentioned how it was that a convicted felon came to be in possession of three firearms. I mean, aren't there laws to prevent that? And isn't Crystal Meth and/or Ecstasy just plain illegal? How is it possible for a criminal to be in possession of such things? We have laws to prevent that from happening, right?


Apparently criminals don't seem to pay much attention to laws. That should be against the law. Or something.

[andrewj]

It'd be nice if he'd point his california viewers to calguns.net, there's so many mis-informed comments from people claiming to live in california, that by telling them about calguns he'd be doing them all a huge favor.

I agree. That would be a great help for his CA viewers.

I wonder if his friend "TNP Research" who he mentioned in the video is a calgunner