I've been thinking about this. If you pitted a professional hunter with all available gear to choose from versus a military sniper and his gear, who do you think would be better?
The sniper has the advantage of very professional training and high end equipment.
The hunter has the advantage of experience.
One area the sniper would probably win is extended range around say...800-1000 yards. But then a lot of civilian marksman can hit targets at that distance just as easily, some with iron sights even.
Lets put the competition to around 200-600 yards.
As for weapons, any weapon is applicable.
You know, that brings up another point. I've often wondered about a dependability/efficiency comparison between military sniper weapons and hunting rifles.
Anyways, discuss.
The sniper has the advantage of very professional training and high end equipment.
The hunter has the advantage of experience.
One area the sniper would probably win is extended range around say...800-1000 yards. But then a lot of civilian marksman can hit targets at that distance just as easily, some with iron sights even.
Lets put the competition to around 200-600 yards.
As for weapons, any weapon is applicable.
You know, that brings up another point. I've often wondered about a dependability/efficiency comparison between military sniper weapons and hunting rifles.
Anyways, discuss.



Comment