Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

PPT issues

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • drdarkness
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 446

    PPT issues

    My background check came up undetermined and 30 days past and the shop won't release a gun undetermined. Here is the problem, the seller and I have decided go to another shop that will release if undetermined, the original shop is making the seller do a background check to pick up his own gun, is this right?
  • #2
    Barang
    CGN Contributor
    • Aug 2013
    • 13260

    what a nightmare! interested to know the answer as well.

    Comment

    • #3
      9Cal_OC
      Calguns Addict
      • Apr 2019
      • 6698

      Who?s the shop?

      IIRC, no DROS would be needed to return to seller. Some shops seem to insist on this apparently.
      Freedom isn't free...

      sigpic

      iTrader

      Comment

      • #4
        Bullets&Whitewalls
        Senior Member
        • May 2012
        • 2376

        No. He should be able to get it back without Dros.

        Comment

        • #5
          foothillman
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2017
          • 1143





          The FFL can legally deliver on undetermined.
          If the FFL choose to ignore a legal transfer than can....
          28050.


          (a) A person shall complete any sale, loan, or transfer of a firearm through a person licensed pursuant to Sections 26700 to 26915, inclusive, in accordance with this chapter in order to comply with Section 27545.

          (b) The seller or transferor or the person loaning the firearm shall deliver the firearm to the dealer who shall retain possession of that firearm.

          (c) The dealer shall then deliver the firearm to the purchaser or transferee or the person being loaned the firearm, if it is not prohibited, in accordance with Section 27540.

          (d) If the dealer cannot legally deliver the firearm to the purchaser or transferee or the person being loaned the firearm, the dealer shall forthwith, without waiting for the conclusion of the waiting period described in Sections 26815 and 27540, return the firearm to the transferor or seller or the person loaning the firearm. The dealer shall not return the firearm to the seller or transferor or the person loaning the firearm when to do so would constitute a violation of Section 27500, 27505, 27515, 27520, 27525, 27530, or 27535.
          ITrader FeedBack https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...k-100-positive

          Comment

          • #6
            aeromech
            Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 332

            I believe that’s correct. The seller will need to dros

            Comment

            • #7
              Djantlive
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2021
              • 612

              Make sure the second ffl will release on undetermined.

              Comment

              • #8
                edgerly779
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Aug 2009
                • 19871

                Seller does not have to dros. Read ;post #5

                Comment

                • #9
                  Russian Bot
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2021
                  • 521

                  Originally posted by foothillman




                  The FFL can legally deliver on undetermined.
                  If the FFL choose to ignore a legal transfer than can....
                  I wonder how this works with undetermined since the dealer can legally deliver to the buyer. I always understood undetermined to still be transfered to the transferee technically.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    foothillman
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2017
                    • 1143

                    ^^^^^^
                    I suspect that it was written to allow a seller to have his property returned in the event the buyer was actually rejected or denied.
                    Not having to wait for 10days from time of PPT.
                    Having a FFL be "extra legal" by not delivering on undetermined was not the intent since it goes the 30days to get that determination.
                    It all goes back to the wording "will" was changed to "shall" deliver is my understanding.
                    Some FFLs see "shall" as a option to deliver.

                    28050.


                    (a) A person shall complete any sale, loan, or transfer of a firearm through a person licensed pursuant to Sections 26700 to 26915, inclusive, in accordance with this chapter in order to comply with Section 27545.

                    (b) The seller or transferor or the person loaning the firearm shall deliver the firearm to the dealer who shall retain possession of that firearm.

                    (c) The dealer shall then deliver the firearm to the purchaser or transferee or the person being loaned the firearm, if it is not prohibited, in accordance with Section 27540.
                    This is a opinion...
                    Legalwriting.net

                    Wayne Schiess's legal-writing blog. Home is here: Legalwriting.net
                    Monday, May 16, 2005
                    "shall" vs. "will"

                    Question:

                    What is your opinion on "shall" vs. "will" in contracts?

                    These words have different meanings but both can be used effectively in contract drafting as long as you're careful about your usage.

                    Shall
                    Did you know that "shall" is the most misused word in all of legal language? It is. In the current edition of Words and Phrases, "shall" alone is followed by 109 pages of case squibs, and "shall" phrases cover 45 more pages. Yet its misuse is one of the most heavily repeated errors in all of law.

                    Here's where lawyers go wrong: When "shall" is used to describe a status, to describe future actions, or to seemingly impose an obligation on an inanimate object, it's being used incorrectly. For example, all of these are wrong:

                    Status: "Full capacity" shall have the following meaning . . .
                    Future action: If . . . then the contract price shall be increased . . .
                    Faulty imposing of obligation: The remaining oil shall be sold by lessee . . .

                    To correctly use "shall," confine it to the meaning "has a duty to" and use it to impose a duty on a capable actor. Bryan A. Garner, A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage 940?941 (2d ed., Oxford U. Press 1995). Here's how:

                    Lessee shall sell the remaining oil . . .

                    In other words--

                    Lessee [an actor capable of carrying out an obligation] shall [has a duty to] sell the remaining oil . . .

                    Some suggest that lawyers are incapable of using "shall" correctly, so we ought to banish it entirely. Mich?le M. Asprey, Shall Must Go, 3 Scribes J. Leg. Writing 79 (1992). One recommendation is to use "must" instead. Of course, you cannot search and replace every "shall" with "must." Scrutinize each use carefully.

                    Will
                    You can use "will" to create a promise--a contractual obligation
                    . See Bryan A. Garner, A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage 941-942 (2d ed., Oxford U. Press 1995). When used in this way, "will" is not merely stating a future event, it is creating a promise to perform:

                    Landlord will clean and maintain all common areas.

                    You could use "shall" for the other party's obligations and "will" for your client?s obligations, though the effect of these words should be the same. The difference reflects only the impact on the reader.

                    Recommendation
                    In most basic contracts, I recommend using "will" to create obligations, as long as you are careful to be sure any given usage can't be read as merely describing future events. I'm generally against "shall" because it is harder to use correctly and it is archaic. But not everyone agrees with me. Kenneth A. Adams, A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting 24-25 (ABA 2004). Adams prefers using "shall" as long as it's used correctly.

                    See also Joseph Kimble, The Many Misuses of Shall, 3 Scribes J. Leg. Writing 61 (1992)

                    posted by Wayne Schiess at 12:43 PM
                    ITrader FeedBack https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...k-100-positive

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      foothillman
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2017
                      • 1143

                      From DOJ

                      ITrader FeedBack https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...k-100-positive

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        ugimports
                        Vendor/Retailer
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 6250

                        Originally posted by edgerly779
                        Seller does not have to dros. Read ;post #5
                        Correct. A 4473 is filled out and CA DOJ provides the NTN number for the seller which is to be used in lieu of a separate DROS.
                        UG Imports - Fremont, CA FFL - Transfers, New Gun Sales
                        Closure Schedule: http://ugimports.com/closed
                        web​ / email / vendor forum

                        I AM THE MAJORITY!!!

                        Amazon Links Posted May be Paid Links

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1