Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Body Armor input

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    madland
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 1255

    And yes..read the link that Librarian posted. There is a lot of info in that thread.

    Comment

    • #17
      wpod
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2014
      • 2395

      I purchased BA for some of the OPs reasons. My reasons and criteria are a little different.
      "Better to have and not need...", might become unavailable in the future.
      Wearing to the range or BLM shooting. For me, only occasionally to BLM to practice shooting while wearing the BA. As most know, it's different.
      I regularly wear it around the house/property once a month to maintain familiarity with it.
      I have steel plates, all 4 sides. It's heavy. But if I NEED to put it on, I ain't "running & gunnin'". I'm too old for that. My intention is more "entrenched defensive position". While family evacuates if it comes down to it.
      RTS Tactical, $500.

      Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • #18
        OCEquestrian
        Calguns Addict
        • Jun 2017
        • 6899

        Originally posted by ASD1
        Ok I will bite

        If the place you are shooting makes you think you need armor find a different place to go.
        ^^^^ That is your answer!
        "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue." ----Sen. Barry Goldwater

        Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ----Benjamin Franklin

        NRA life member
        SAF life member
        CRPA member

        Comment

        • #19
          FNGGlock
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2020
          • 1289

          Thanks guys, lots of interesting input.

          As I stated was just looking for potentially a bit more peace of mind, and to get something now in case Sacramento cooks up a law to ban armor.

          The other thread has a lot of good info, but doesn't give good feedback on how comfortable/feasible it is that people will actually wear the armor in general. However it seems that it will likely be one of those things that it is too uncomfortable to wear and likely just get left at home for general use.

          I was very interested in this type of soft armor, but it does cover rifle rounds unfortunately. It does look like it will be much more feasible to wear in general, may be a good option for public ranges, as the pistol side is typically the most dodgy.

          Comment

          • #20
            tomk556
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2008
            • 865

            Honestly even wearing soft armor for an extended amount of time takes a ton of discipline. You could just buy a cheap surplus IIIA soft armor vest and see how you like wearing that to begin with.

            I’ve never heard of soft armor that can stop rifle velocity. I looked at the link. Neat, but unless I missed it the rifle rating is. It NIJ backed.

            Maybe it is NIJ tested. The site comes in weird on my phone.

            Comment

            • #21
              Tere_Hanges
              Calguns Addict
              • Mar 2013
              • 6270

              OP, if youre concerned about pistol and comfort just get a level II vest as that will cover most pistol threats up to .357 mag. And you can wear it under a tshirt no one will even know. But probably not necessary at a supervised range.
              CRPA and NRA member.

              Note that those who have repeatedly expressed enough vile and incoherent content as to render your views irrelevant, have been placed on my ignore list. Thank you for helping me improve my experience and direct my attention towards those who are worthy of it. God bless your toxic little souls.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1