That does not match what you quoted.
When buying a handgun from a dealer, one per 30 days, rimfire or centerfire.
When buying from another non-FFL CA resident, using a CA FFL because the law requires it (that's a PPT), NO 1 in 30 time limit - except if you do that transfer at an FFL inside the city of LA.
Rimfire gets special treatment 2 places - they're not included in the definition of 'assault weapon' as such. One could build a .22 rimfire upper on a banned-by-name lower, for example, and it would be Bad.
.22 caliber guns with attached tube magazines are not included in the 'large-capacity magazine' definition. "Rimfire" is implied, but if there are .22 centerfire tube fed guns, those would also be exempt.
When buying a handgun from a dealer, one per 30 days, rimfire or centerfire.
When buying from another non-FFL CA resident, using a CA FFL because the law requires it (that's a PPT), NO 1 in 30 time limit - except if you do that transfer at an FFL inside the city of LA.
Rimfire gets special treatment 2 places - they're not included in the definition of 'assault weapon' as such. One could build a .22 rimfire upper on a banned-by-name lower, for example, and it would be Bad.
.22 caliber guns with attached tube magazines are not included in the 'large-capacity magazine' definition. "Rimfire" is implied, but if there are .22 centerfire tube fed guns, those would also be exempt.

Comment