What's 10 more days

[SGVgunner]

Been a long wait from Tylors but here it is.IMG_5487 2.jpg

[mausercat]

Dan Lungren (the attorney general) back in 1992 or 1993 extended the 15 day wait we had back then by 5 days. So the wait was 20 days. Since everything had to be mailed back then and it was after the riots and he said that his office could not handle the background check in 15 days.

[The Gleam]

Dan Lungren (the attorney general) back in 1992 or 1993 extended the 15 day wait we had back then by 5 days. So the wait was 20 days. Since everything had to be mailed back then and it was after the riots and he said that his office could not handle the background check in 15 days.

The 10-Day waiting period is one of the softest targets post-Bruen that there is among California's Anti-2nd Amendment legislation labyrinth - I'm puzzled as to why it has not been tackled yet.

---

[golfish]

Nice OP...

Looks like a 16" trapper model 92 takedown ( do I need to say short rifle ) ... .357 ?

Hopefully it's a dark walnut and not from the 70s

[SGVgunner]

9 months of waiting for this 16" .357 Alaskan takedown. I envy our Arizona brothers able to walk-in and walk-out with their firearms..

[Zenderfall]

The 10-Day waiting period is one of the softest targets post-Bruen that there is among California's Anti-2nd Amendment legislation labyrinth - I'm puzzled as to why it has not been tackled yet.

---

Probably because it is just an inconvenience-people will eventually get their gun. 3 day, 5 day, 10 days, 15 days. They?ll grumble, but they will put up with it. They?re allocating resources towards the one that keeps guns out of our hands like the roster instead.

[pacrat]

The 10-Day waiting period is one of the softest targets post-Bruen that there is among California's Anti-2nd Amendment legislation labyrinth - I'm puzzled as to why it has not been tackled yet.

---

You are about 2 months behind the info curve.

https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=1858142

[The Gleam]

Probably because it is just an inconvenience-people will eventually get their gun. 3 day, 5 day, 10 days, 15 days. They?ll grumble, but they will put up with it. They?re allocating resources towards the one that keeps guns out of our hands like the roster instead.

I'm fully aware of the latter, yet that is dragging on because it was in fact a harder target, when combined with governmental ability to oversee product safety (as their claim), where the likely outcome will be only the removal of the microstamping requirement.

The 10-day wait and 1-per-30 would be resolved much faster, as they are strictly a delay of a civil right, with no argument that government has authority to do so.

These would represent the first dominos to quickly and easily fall, first but significant wins, that would have better set the tone for several others that would otherwise prove more mercurial without a prior recurring theme of more obvious CA Anti-2nd Amendment legislation falling in succession to precede it - (like we are seeing with the Roster as the first to be targeted).

It's like putting all power to the one wheel stuck in the mud when there are three other wheels with better footing on solid dry ground, to easily pull you out - the one in the mud will more easily follow the other three.

The Roster legislation is that wheel in the mud.

---

[The Gleam]

You are about 2 months behind the info curve.

https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1858142

Perfect - thanks - not sure how I missed that, as I've had my eye on several cases / legislation all at once, and May/June are my busiest months of the year with that.

Carry on.....

---