Which and why? For no particular reason other than a sunny Monday afternoon.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assault weapon or Roster? If you could toss one...
Collapse
X
-
I’ll wait for both……Thanks"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" -
? "If you want nice fresh oats, you have to pay a fair price. If you are satisfied with oats that have already been through the horse, well, that comes a little cheaper."
Comment
-
Assault, my Tavor wants to be 26". My pistol hates the mag lock, my rifles all want 30+ rounds in them. I don't like the fin grips. My AK wants a folding stock. I might get a p90 clone that doesn't look idiotic.Comment
-
I think the same argument the Judge used about LEO widely using guns that do not appear on the Roster, could be said about the features configuration of AR15s that LEO have in each of their squad cars in most all cities in CA.
What's the justification that they are allowed that configuration and a law-abiding non-LEO is not?
They are not 'military' any more than a banker or construction worker may be.
So neither one over the other: both the Roster and the SB23 features ban, .50BMG ban, and idiotic Bullet Button ban, could fall by the same arguments about 'features' (or caliber) being the target, where one configuration exists for LEO and another exists for John Doe, without any justification.
I've made this argument before, that there is no LEO or military anywhere, using any firearms with 'bullet buttons' so those should never have been defined as 'Assault Weapons' on that basis alone, let alone requiring no pistol-grips/grip-wraps, no flash-hider, fixed-mag, or other such nonsense.
---Last edited by The Gleam; 03-20-2023, 5:44 PM.-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
No compromise!
The roster, AW ban, and the mag ban are all unconstitutional, and it is time for them to go away.
Then we can turn attention to all of the other unconstitutional firearms restrictions.Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference. So said somebody but not Mark Twain
"One argues to a judge, one does not argue with a judge." Me
"Never argue unless you are getting paid." CDAA
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it." George Bernard ShawComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,855,719
Posts: 25,010,945
Members: 353,847
Active Members: 5,714
Welcome to our newest member, Hadesloridan.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3070 users online. 172 members and 2898 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment