Transporting/Using Freedom Week Mags

[sbo80]

but we don't know about freedom mags yets, are they grandfathered , will they need to be registered, or what

??. Yes we do. The law as written says all 10+ magazines are illegal to possess, period. No grandfather, no registration. (though exemptions for LEO etc.). The 9th Circuit just agreed the law is good as it is written. If the SC overturns it, then the whole law is removed and irrelevant. It's really only one or the other.

[RickD427]

It's seems like we're just rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. Doesn't matter what we do; it's going down.

I gotta respectfully disagree. The ship is not "going down." The ship is setting a new course for the Supreme Court. And we pretty much knew that was going to be the outcome all along.

We also have an apparent new development that may prove helpful in the Supreme Court. The NYSPRA v Bruen case was recently argued before the Court. A lot of the Justice's questions seemed to question the use of Intermediate Scrutiny in that case. If their decision finds that Strict Scrutiny is the required standard for review of Second Amendment cases, then look for Duncan (as well as other similar cases) to be quickly disposed of at the Supreme Court.

The process of "Grant, Vacate, and Remand (GVR)" is often used to quickly dispose of cases that were pending when the Supreme Court decides a related case. Rather than give the pending cases the full treatment, the Court grants a hearing, vacates the lower court decision, and remands the case for handling per the prior decision. It's kinda a legal way of saying "Ditto."

[Deelayed]

It's seems like we're just rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. Doesn't matter what we do; it's going down.

Musical chairs with no music and the chairs have only 2 1/2 legs ..

[Deelayed]

The part about "Teach a man to fish and you'll feed him for a lifetime" line is that once a man really learns how to fish, he spends all his money on fishing gear and fishing trips. Then he gets divorced and he's then forever broke and hungry.

And don't forget the bitter
Or maybe I can't believe it's not bitter....

[RickD427]

I noticed that . I didn't want to come off as condescending or plagiaristic.

The part about "Teach a man to fish and you'll feed him for a lifetime" line is that once a man really learns how to fish, he spends all his money on fishing gear and fishing trips. Then he gets divorced and he's then forever broke and hungry.

[Deelayed]

I prefer the version of that lesson that starts "Build a man a fire....."

I noticed that . I didn't want to come off as condescending or plagiaristic.

[RickD427]

....
Teach a man to fish...

I prefer the version of that lesson that starts "Build a man a fire....."

[Deelayed]

It's not news. "Crime" and "Public Offense" are synonymous.

It's been that way since 1872.

Please refer to Penal Code sections 15 and 16 for the definition of the terms.

Public offender ..= state/court appointed attorney
Thank you for the reference . I am no longer ignorant regarding the aforementioned term "public offense "
....
Teach a man to fish...

[RickD427]

Public offense . I've heard of misdemeanor and felony . But public offense is new to me .

It's not news. "Crime" and "Public Offense" are synonymous.

It's been that way since 1872.

Please refer to Penal Code sections 15 and 16 for the definition of the terms.

[Deelayed]

It has been stated on Calguns many times: You do not need to prove your innocence. THEY need to prove your guilt.



For those who may be thinking that sandpaper works well on plastic. Please consider this:

Public offense . I've heard of misdemeanor and felony . But public offense is new to me .

[ar15barrels]

Are you going to change your behavior now that it's a felony?

A felony is a crime with a possible jail term exceeding 1 year.

32310.
(c) Except as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 32400) of this chapter and in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Division 2 of Title 2, commencing July 1, 2017, any person in this state who possesses any large-capacity magazine, regardless of the date the magazine was acquired, is guilty of an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) per large-capacity magazine, or is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) per large-capacity magazine, by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

If you are going to make up FUD, at least research it a little before you spew it.

[ohsmily]

Are you going to change your behavior now that it's a felony? I won't. I figured this crap would happen here, after all, it's California. 10 rounders only outside the house as always.

Best to fly under the radar here. Or play wack-a-mole?

Are you going to change your tune now that you're wrong AGAIN. Read PC 32310(c). Seriously, do you just sit around figuring out what you're going to make up next? Stop spreading BS FUD...geezus.

[homelessdude]

I guess we finally get to see if the SC can live up to the expectations we have for it.

[Jimi Jah]

To each their own based on their risk tolerance. I have no hesitation to use all magazines that I own outside the home irrespective of capacity.

Are you going to change your behavior now that it's a felony? I won't. I figured this crap would happen here, after all, it's California. 10 rounders only outside the house as always.

Best to fly under the radar here. Or play wack-a-mole?

[five.five-six]

Moot point looks like 9th circuit ruled no large cap mags. Now maybe a scotus issue.