2 different DROS at same time?

[ar15barrels]

So I'm good on adding a concurrent dros for a ppt pistol?

Yes

[kelvin232]

Thnx for the feedback!

[The Gleam]

A few stores have reported that the DROS was snagged in combination with handguns and/or Semi-auto rifles that were DROSed BEFORE 7/1/2021, in combination with any of the same that were then DROSed after 7/1/2021 but had been within 30 days of the previous June DROS date for the former (excluding PPT purchases of course).

It appears the DOJ applied this retroactively to prior purchases beginning 7/1/2021 for subsequent like-and-kind purchase thereafter - and that's a crock of crap.

Keep in mind, this includes C&R (pending you don't have a C&R/COE to be exempt). So if you go buy a rare, certified Garand M1-C that is a dealer-sale, this oppression-fest still applies to when you then want to pick up that WWII 1942 1911.

So imagine telling a 96 year old collector that could very well have carried either one of these in the Sicilian campaign behind Patton in 1943, and ironically, could even have even been Patton's neighbor in San Gabriel, CA of all places - and now he's being told he is limited to how many he can buy in a month's time some 78 years later - or anyone else for that matter, whether 18 or 96. It matters not, but the connotation of restricting the purchase of an iconic M1 Garand, considering the production numbers and how many remain in circulation, to any number of generations existing in this state at this moment - is an abhorrent perverted restriction on law-abiding gun owners.

It's ludicrous. There is no rhyme or reason to 1-per-30 day purchase-limits.

If I already own 1, 5, or 60, it makes no difference if I in fact buy another 3, no different than Jay Leno owns 700 cars. What he does with 1, makes no difference that he has 699 still parked back in his garages in Burbank, San Fernando, and Sun Valley.

It's arbitrary, random, and does nothing to reduce criminals' acquisition and use of guns; with all the registration schemes we already have it's asinine and silly to think there is any legitimate belief that anyone is doing volume "straw-man" re-selling of a gun off the books, on guns that are forever tied to them in CA by serial number.

The latter alone discourages the false urban-legend that any such law-abiding gun buyer of any measurable volume in CA is doing so to flip new guns, whereby PPT are exempt anyway. The purchase-limit is a nonsensical farce created by elitist politicians who don't realize or understand the Anti-2nd Amendment legislation already on the books that precludes any need for purchase limits, who don't own a gun, don't like guns, have no use for a gun due to mentally-dysfunctional hoplophobia, don't want YOU to have guns, and want to do away with guns altogether.

Long-guns had always stood the "meets all needs" for the 2nd Amendment, semi-auto or not, and I should think that if a Federal Court gets hold of this, it will not only force California to reverse its position on 1-per-30 day purchase limits on semi-auto rifles (i.e., basing it on the Garand would be a nice touch) - but will then also force CA to remove it's 1-per-30 day purchase limits on dealer-inventory sale handguns too, just as a Federal Court reversed a restriction today on prohibiting 18-21 year olds from buying handguns.

Such delineated diarrhea of this magnitude is beyond any anemic logic used to justify it, even for the CA legislature.

I expect this to be tossed in time, dragging the handgun 1-per-30 day purchase limit down to hell with it.

[Markinsac]

[unusedusername]

The new 1-in-30 rule exists to make it harder for instructors to build up enough firearms to run a basic firearm safety class. It takes a few 22s, and one of each of the other action types to run the basic class.

If it takes a year to buy the guns then less people will each basic safety classes.

[ar15barrels]

The new 1-in-30 rule exists to make it harder for instructors to build up enough firearms to run a basic firearm safety class. It takes a few 22s, and one of each of the other action types to run the basic class.

If it takes a year to buy the guns then less people will each basic safety classes.

Anybody who needs to do that could simply get their 03/COE and become exempt within a month or two.

[CartridgeCalls]

Are FFL03 plus COE still exempt from the 1/30? I keep trying to enter it and it wont work.

[SkyHawk]

Are FFL03 plus COE still exempt from the 1/30? I keep trying to enter it and it wont work.

Yes they are exempt. It has to be processed as C&R transaction

See this bulletin (which probably needs to be updated to cover long guns)

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/3111/attachments/original/1528932424/Bulletin_Name_%2850%29_Important_Notice_Regarding_1_and_30_Exemptions_for_a_03_FFL_with_a_COE__posted_5-29-18_%281%29_%281%29.pdf?1528932424