Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SCAR 20 SSR question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    tradecraft
    Veteran Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 4630

    Originally posted by alks207
    What's wrong with my stock?
    Join fnforum and search for your stock on there for the issue.
    Link to my feedback: https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...ser-tradecraft

    Comment

    • #17
      theLBC
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      CGN Contributor
      • Oct 2017
      • 7071

      Originally posted by tradecraft
      Join fnforum and search for your stock on there for the issue.
      it's nothing that a wrench or blue loktite won't solve.
      the barrel bolts are loose sometimes as well.

      Comment

      • #18
        ScottsBad
        Progressives Suck!
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • May 2009
        • 5610

        Originally posted by alks207
        Good morning fellow calgunners. I need to show some love to the SCAR 20S and want to spice it up. Exactly which sights and bipod come on the scar20 SSR?
        Send an email to FN or ask on the FNForum.

        I'd get the FN SCAR rear sight. But for that rifle I probably wouldn't get any irons at all.

        Just because FN made a version equipped with irons doesn't mean that that is a good way to do it.

        I would put an offset RMR or T2 on it, if I felt the need to put a backup on it.

        I have two 17S and I've kept them fairly stock, except the Geissele triggers, glass, lights, and QD sling attachments. But my plans are for the SCARs to be 7.62 NATO battle rifles, so I've kept them as light as possible. Essentially, I regard them to be more capable SCAR 16s to me (which I also have two of.)

        With the glass you've put on the 20S, you've taken a heavier rifle and turned it into a tank. You're not going to be running around in the woods with it, so it really doesn't need secondary sights. And night vision would be a waste of time, unless you go thermal sight. I don't know, its a sniper rifle. A fun precision rifle that is only good for that.

        I wish FN would make a SCAR with the same extended rail, but with the lighter and shorter 16" or an 18" in 7.62 NATO or 6.5 Creedmore. And without the freaking precision stock.

        I actually considered buying a 20S, ditching or cutting the 20" barrel down to 16-18", selling the sniper stock, and putting on the "moon boot" stock, but this was just ridiculous to do.

        The FN SCAR system is great, but FN sucks when it comes to innovation, and alternative configurations.

        I would probably ditch my SCAR 16s, except I want to SBR them when I get to Idaho and put on cans. They have a piston system that should work well suppressed.

        I've created quite a few quality, highly capable and acurate ARs now, and I have enough back-up parts to fix all of them several times over. But I've found it very difficult to get all the backup parts for the SCARs, I've got quite a few backup small parts, but getting replacement bolts for instance is almost impossible.

        Sorry to get off on a rant, but frankly I'm really ranting at FN.

        JMHO
        Last edited by ScottsBad; 02-14-2021, 12:14 PM.
        sigpicC'mon man, shouldn't we ban Democracks from Cal-Guns? Or at least send them to re-education camps.

        Comment

        • #19
          alks207
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2008
          • 1727

          Originally posted by tradecraft
          Join fnforum and search for your stock on there for the issue.
          Helpfull

          Comment

          • #20
            alks207
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2008
            • 1727

            Originally posted by theLBC
            it's nothing that a wrench or blue loktite won't solve.
            the barrel bolts are loose sometimes as well.
            Thank you for you feedback

            Comment

            • #21
              alks207
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2008
              • 1727

              Originally posted by ScottsBad
              Send an email to FN or ask on the FNForum.

              I'd get the FN SCAR rear sight. But for that rifle I probably wouldn't get any irons at all.

              Just because FN made a version equipped with irons doesn't mean that that is a good way to do it.

              I would put an offset RMR or T2 on it, if I felt the need to put a backup on it.

              I have two 17S and I've kept them fairly stock, except the Geissele triggers, glass, lights, and QD sling attachments. But my plans are for the SCARs to be 7.62 NATO battle rifles, so I've kept them as light as possible. Essentially, I regard them to be more capable SCAR 16s to me (which I also have two of.)

              With the glass you've put on the 20S, you've taken a heavier rifle and turned it into a tank. You're not going to be running around in the woods with it, so it really doesn't need secondary sights. And night vision would be a waste of time, unless you go thermal sight. I don't know, its a sniper rifle. A fun precision rifle that is only good for that.

              I wish FN would make a SCAR with the same extended rail, but with the lighter and shorter 16" or an 18" in 7.62 NATO or 6.5 Creedmore. And without the freaking precision stock.

              I actually considered buying a 20S, ditching or cutting the 20" barrel down to 16-18", selling the sniper stock, and putting on the "moon boot" stock, but this was just ridiculous to do.

              The FN SCAR system is great, but FN sucks when it comes to innovation, and alternative configurations.

              I would probably ditch my SCAR 16s, except I want to SBR them when I get to Idaho and put on cans. They have a piston system that should work well suppressed.

              I've created quite a few quality, highly capable and acurate ARs now, and I have enough back-up parts to fix all of them several times over. But I've found it very difficult to get all the backup parts for the SCARs, I've got quite a few backup small parts, but getting replacement bolts for instance is almost impossible.

              Sorry to get off on a rant, but frankly I'm really ranting at FN.

              JMHO
              Awesome. Thank you very much for your input. I really just want a military clone for collectability reasons.

              Comment

              • #22
                theLBC
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Oct 2017
                • 7071

                some people run a 17s stock on the 20s, or any aftermarket stock they want, since they are all compatible. just remember that there are polymer components to the oem stocks for a reason (shock absorption)

                Comment

                • #23
                  ScottsBad
                  Progressives Suck!
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • May 2009
                  • 5610

                  Originally posted by theLBC
                  some people run a 17s stock on the 20s, or any aftermarket stock they want, since they are all compatible. just remember that there are polymer components to the oem stocks for a reason (shock absorption)
                  This is true. If you remove the polymer stock parts, the rail screws and rear plate screws can loosen or break.

                  Frankly, its better to keep them as stock as possible.
                  sigpicC'mon man, shouldn't we ban Democracks from Cal-Guns? Or at least send them to re-education camps.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1