Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Glock 43X 15 round magazine?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kennymallory1
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 568

    Glock 43X 15 round magazine?

    https://shieldarms.com/glock-43x-48-15-round-mag


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by kennymallory1; 05-04-2020, 1:51 PM.
  • #2
    baranski
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 3852

    Yes, several thousand rounds, zero issues.
    Originally posted by ACfixer
    there's plenty of sissies and snitches roaming the hallways here.

    Comment

    • #3
      kennymallory1
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2017
      • 568

      Think it would be pretty cool to have the 15 plus one 43x and a Sig P365 in a carry rotation. Maybe throw in a Glock 29 as well ha ha.


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • #4
        baranski
        Veteran Member
        • Oct 2015
        • 3852

        Originally posted by kennymallory1
        Think it would be pretty cool to have the 15 plus one 43x and a Sig P365 in a carry rotation. Maybe throw in a Glock 29 as well ha ha.


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


        +1 on the G29 for sure.
        Originally posted by ACfixer
        there's plenty of sissies and snitches roaming the hallways here.

        Comment

        • #5
          n8vrmind
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2017
          • 1481

          Changing out mag release button has been recommended when using these aftermarket mags. Search for TFB YouTube video on this topics

          Comment

          • #6
            plumbum
            Calguns Addict
            • May 2010
            • 5394

            If this were a free world, I would most certainly feel my bases were covered with both a G43 and a G43x - the metal style magazines really make sense (but odd the Gaston lets a third party make the G43x competitive).
            Originally posted by ysr_racer
            Please don't bring logic and reason into an interwebs discussion

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1