Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SIG SAUER MG 338 Machine Gun

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tuolumnejim
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Jun 2008
    • 11110

    SIG SAUER MG 338 Machine Gun

    Besides the obvious "we can't have nice things" I like it. Then theres the hell I can't afford to feed my dual 1919's alot and that .338 would bankrupt me.



    In a state where corruption abounds, laws must be very numerous.
    Publius Cornelius Scipio

    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.
    ― Thomas Jefferson

    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
    John Adams
  • #2
    bug_eyedmonster
    • Oct 2007
    • 3639

    Yeah, but why .338 Norma Magnum? Seems like an odd choice.

    Jerry
    The inconvenience of poor quality lingers long after the thrill of a good bargain.

    Comment

    • #3
      deadcoyote
      Veteran Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 4002

      Originally posted by bug_eyedmonster
      Yeah, but why .338 Norma Magnum? Seems like an odd choice.

      Jerry
      Buying a safe and sane firework is like paying a hooker for a hug. I do not see the appeal in it.

      Comment

      • #4
        instaramen
        Member
        • May 2019
        • 383

        I'm thinking that too. Supposedly, it's got more power and range than the 240 and better point target accuracy than the M2 at longer ranges. Streamline logistics and save money, definitely something the army would do.

        Comment

        • #5
          L.A. Saiga
          Senior Member
          • May 2012
          • 1787

          USSOCOM Completes Safety Cert and Purchase of SIG SAUER MG 338 Machine Guns

          "USSOCOM Completes Safety Certification and Purchase of SIG SAUER MG 338 Machine Guns, Ammunition, and Next Generation Suppressors"

          Sig MG338, anyone?

          Thoughts?



          I searched and I did not see a post yet
          Last edited by L.A. Saiga; 01-17-2020, 8:15 PM.
          Here's my iTrader feedback: (iTrader score is 244. I have ZERO negative feedback) https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...user-l-a-saiga

          Comment

          • #6
            Yodaman
            Veteran Member
            • Aug 2012
            • 2749

            When it counts!


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • #7
              pacrat
              I need a LIFE!!
              • May 2014
              • 10285

              L.A. Saiga asked.

              Thoughts?

              OK, another very expensive solution searching for a problem to solve.

              Comment

              • #8
                Quiet
                retired Goon
                • Mar 2007
                • 30242

                Originally posted by bug_eyedmonster
                Yeah, but why .338 Norma Magnum? Seems like an odd choice.
                Back in 2017, US SOCOM wanted a machine gun that could engage targets farther than 7.62x51mm and with weight/portability being lighter than a .50BMG.

                They tested platforms in .300Winchester Magnum, .300Norma Magnum, .338Norma Magnum, and .338Lapua Magnum.

                The .338Norma Magnum was found to feed from links better than the other cartridges.
                sigpic

                "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

                Comment

                • #9
                  sigstroker
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 19745

                  How much is the semi-auto version?

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    freonr22
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 12945

                    That's a better use of tax dollars, than 0bama phones
                    sigpic
                    Originally posted by dantodd
                    We will win. We are right. We will never stop fighting.
                    Originally posted by bwiese
                    They don't believe it's possible, but then Alison didn't believe there'd be 350K - 400K OLLs in CA either.
                    Originally posted by louisianagirl
                    Our fate is ours alone to decide as long as we remain armed heavily enough to dictate it.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      jarhead714
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 9226

                      Once they enter service, how long will it be before Sig recalls them because they don’t f’n work right?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        aklon
                        Veteran Member
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 3136

                        Originally posted by instaramen
                        I'm thinking that too. Supposedly, it's got more power and range than the 240 and better point target accuracy than the M2 at longer ranges. Streamline logistics and save money, definitely something the army would do.
                        Maybe it's just me, but I can't imagine a future without the Ma Deuce.
                        Freedom is the dream you dream while putting thought in chains.

                        - Giacomo Leopardi

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          sigstroker
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 19745

                          They'll keep the fifty for hard targets. .338 bullets are too small for much incendiary compound or explosive for stuff like Raufoss.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          UA-8071174-1