Common Use Firearms

[rabbitowner]

Has the California Hand Gun Rooster restrictions been challenged in court yet? I thought that firearms in "common use" had been allowed by the Supreme Court. It seems to me that the rooster nullifies this. Certainly guns once on the list, but removed because the maker no longer wants to pay the fee could be considered common use firearms.

by taking guns off the list do to the maker no longer reupping the fee for relisting, this makes purchase or inheritance of older, used firearms not legal.

It seems to me the rooster, specially the requirement of a maintenance fee to keep a gun on the list does does violate the common use rule. Also the fact that law enforcement can buy these off list guns for personal use seems to make these off list guns common use.

What is going on with this?

[tradecraft]

Well you certainly have animals on the mind...

[rabbitowner]

Well you certainly have animals on the mind...

Well it is a cockamamie roster.

fixed it

thanks!

[Jeepergeo]

Well it is a cockamamie roster.

fixed it

thanks!

For a moment there, I thought CA was starting to require us to get the approval of a 'rooster' before buying a gun. That would be fowl, but would not surprise me.

[Librarian]

Has the California Hand Gun Rooster restrictions been challenged in court yet?

Pena vs Cid/Harris/Becerra/CA-AG-of-the-week. http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=812117

Thought to be on hold for the decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association. http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s....php?t=1486495

We follow lawsuits in the 2 litigation fora.