Magazine ban, a real crap shoot.

[USMCM16A2]

[Subotai]

Well, just be ready to throw away all your mags if we lose. We're law-abiding citizens, y'know.

[LongLiveTheRepublic]

Well, just be ready to throw away all your mags if we lose. We're law-abiding citizens, y'know.

Mags? What mags?

[FullMetalJacket]

A second boating accident in 18 months?

What are the chances...?

[blind guardian]

luckily, i didn’t buy any magazines.

[Non Political Californian]

There may or may not be several mags hiding in an attic writing diaries.

[THE ANTIDOTE]

My neighbor received a suspicious package on his porch and thought it was strange anyone would send him anything so as a good neighbor/deed...i offered to take it back to the post office for him.

[Romeo_alpha01]

So where’s the outcry on our end?

[chihuahuasniper]

No sh*t. The state just re-lubbed our butts and getting ready to go balls deep into the firearms community.

[r8dr rider]

I sold all mine to a guy I played poker with and his dad is a correction officer

[striker777]

who cares I use them anyway where I shoot there is no magazine police!!!!!! f them

[BucDan]

Didn't Trump already pack the 9th? What's the weight there?

[559BearDown]

Buc Dan, Trump is bringing more balance to the 9th, but Constitutional judges are still outnumbered there.

[USMCM16A2]

I see PC32310 A and B sticking around, but wobbly on C and D. Unless Becerra gets real hard ***. We’ll see A2

[CALI-gula]

I suspect the 9th will allow possession of those pre-2000 and these past 6 days to remain legal, prohibit a "taking" but continue to allow the ban on future sales, trading, gifting, manufacturing, etc.

However, there is no reason to get negative about it ahead of a ruling; whatever they are going to do it's beyond your power to have impact. You are better off spending your time fighting the current bills going through their processes before the CA legislature in Sacramento.

I had mostly given up on the latter, but this recent injection of hope for freedom with meaningful measures has renewed a bit of my drive to fight this crap again.

If anything, it's a good validator as to why so many of us plead how important it is to pay attention to the Judges on the ballot when elections are on high. So many voters either ignore that or vote solely based on the sound of a last name. Benitez is no slouch. Can you imagine if we could vote hundreds more like him into the courts of CA if we only researched and educated each other on who and what are the likely positions of Judges based on their historical decisions when they are up for election and/or confirmation?

.