Dems accuse NRA of hate speech !

[ja308]

I thought I heard it all when dems called for trains to replace air travel, retrofitting every building in the USA before 12 year time line when the planet is destroyed from using fossil fuels or eliminating the cattle industry !

But honestly folks this is even more over the top. Now our NRA is accused of hate speech by democrats !

https://defconnews.com/2019/02/24/liberals-accuse-nra-of-hate-speech-for-opposing-gun-control/

[Divernhunter]

Anyone who believes the democrap drivel has an IQ of about 12 and a total lack of common sense.

Yet there are many brain dead sheep out there.

[howbobert]

You just have to remember this. Anytime you disagree with those on the left, they consider it hate speech.

[GW]

Just...

[wpage]

Dems continue to shoot themselves in the foot. Loosing tracktion with thier own folks. Many Democrats are NRA members. They do not appreciate the noise.

[M76]

Reminds me of the left losing it over an electoral map that featured
giffords and a surveyor's mark during the 2008 campaign. In fact
they blamed the AZ shooting on Gov Palin for posting that graphic.

[The War Wagon]

I accuse demtards of IMBECILE speech!!!

An American Epidemic: Toxic Imbecility

Washington Post, the New York Times,Weekly Standard or staring at a screen grab of The Bulwark; and, if untreated, it can lead the afflicted to follow Max Boot on Twitter and tattooing #NeverTrump onto their rumps (right beside where their heads entered).
Other symptoms of toxic imbecility include but are certainly not limited to the following:

• A febrile feverA feeling of irrational gratitudeA delusionA persistent aching for open borders everywhere except in your gated community.
• A paranoid belief that President Trump, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, U.S. Representative Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the NRA, the GOP, the NRCC, the NRSC and, hell, the Mormon Tabernacle Choir are all Russian assets.
• Conflating contrary views with violence and hate speech; demanding safe spaces from such differing ideas; and a generalized, free-floating anxiety about the dangers of free speech.
• Being possessed

[GDC]

Dems continue to shoot themselves in the foot. Loosing tracktion with thier own folks. Many Democrats are NRA members. They do not appreciate the noise.

Less and less.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/236315/record-partisan-divide-views-nra.aspx

The gun control lobby and Democratic party have had a deep interest in making the gun control issue as partisan aligned as possible and have been successful with that. The key to keeping money flowing into the gun control lobby is to make near as effective as giving to the DNC itself in terms of effect, while greatly leveraging non-profit (and therefore outside of reporting requirements) and charitable (and therefore tax deductible) giving advantages facilitated by gun control lobby groups.

[ja308]

24% of democrat view the NRA favorably ? sounds a little high to me !

[kurac]

The lunatic limo liberals don't have a leg to stand on so to end a debate they will resort to calling your message "hate speech" "racist" or "victim blaming" something along those lines.

[ja308]

So none of you thought that headline was provocative, threatening or might encourage the next Caesar Seyoc?!

It was threatening. It was intended to be threatening. Just as President man baby's 'very nice' language is threatening and encourages violence against the free press.

Also as an FYI to Ja308, many other countries require all buildings to be updated (10-12 years) periodically. This is hardly a radical idea. Buildings consume well over a third of the energy consumed in this country every day. Particularly here in CA, we continue to build more efficient buildings with each new cycle of Title 24. But seventy percent of the housing that will exist in this country fifty years from now exists today. Older buildings need to be updated to be more efficient. As a side note doing so creates better Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) so they are healthier to live in. When done correctly these retrofits should not only reduce the energy costs of operating the building, and make the building last longer with reduced maintenance costs.

Sorry to thread jack.

I didn't see the NRA ad as threat and those so called crosshairs do not resemble anything Ive ever looked through .

That said how about a link or 2 proving other nations regularly retrofit every building as said by Cortez.
I also would enjoy a link as to how new building increase health and longevity as you have stated .

https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/22/ocasio-cortez-green-new-deal-buildings/

"A new study suggests a main goal of the Green New Deal would be an immense waste of resources.
The Green New Deal calls for “upgrading all existing buildings” to “achieve maximum energy efficiency.”
However, researchers found that energy efficiency policies “are not likely to significantly reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions...”

[nick]

So none of you thought that headline was provocative, threatening or might encourage the next Caesar Seyoc?!

It was threatening. It was intended to be threatening. Just as President man baby's 'very nice' language is threatening and encourages violence against the free press.

Also as an FYI to Ja308, many other countries require all buildings to be updated (10-12 years) periodically. This is hardly a radical idea. Buildings consume well over a third of the energy consumed in this country every day. Particularly here in CA, we continue to build more efficient buildings with each new cycle of Title 24. But seventy percent of the housing that will exist in this country fifty years from now exists today. Older buildings need to be updated to be more efficient. As a side note doing so creates better Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) so they are healthier to live in. When done correctly these retrofits should not only reduce the energy costs of operating the building, and make the building last longer with reduced maintenance costs.

Sorry to thread jack.

The article is clearly about gun owners being the target of Democrats. To read something else into it one has to either be a very special hysterical snowflake having a preprogrammed panic attack, or a liar trying hard to find something to be outraged about (and manufacturing it when he fails to find the said outrage), or someone who hasn't read the article but went along with the paranoia and fake outrage because it suits his convictions. There's a lot of all 3 types and their combinations these days.

[L84CABO]

It's hilarious that Eric Swalwell spewed this...

This is a call for violence by the @NRA

Recall that Swalwell was the jack-wagon that threatened to nuke Americans if they didn't surrender their guns.

Dan Crenshaw, however, went after him...

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/eric-swalwell-crenshaw-nra/

[LuckyGuy]

Wellllll

You just have to remember this. Anytime you disagree with those on the left, they consider it hate speech.

The Demos hate NRA because they hate Guns FkM.

[The War Wagon]

Yeah, you're right, the article is. But the image?! That headline(!) is intended to be provocative. Its intended to be threatening. In one case to a woman who spent months learning how to walk, eat, move and talk again after surviving an attempted murder.

That was intended to intimidate Gabby Giffords.

You're defending the indefensible. That was repugnant.

What is the point of you?