Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

LIES>>>>>Licensed to kill? Gunmen in killings had permits

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • U2BassAce
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 1677

    LIES>>>>>Licensed to kill? Gunmen in killings had permits




    ARE YOU KIDDIG ME????????????????????????

    Total lies and BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You have to hit the link to appreciate the story. You will see the photo of the NY State GUN PURCHASE (not CCW) permit for the only shooter that had a legal firearm on him. My count only one of the people in recent rampage attacks was legal with their firearm.
    Last edited by U2BassAce; 04-07-2009, 10:24 PM.
  • #2
    U2BassAce
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 1677

    Comment

    • #3
      jumbopanda
      Calguns Addict
      • Aug 2006
      • 8382

      These "journalists" aren't fit to clean toilets.
      Mo' BBs.

      Comment

      • #4

        I think the trick is, but saying had a "permit" the average person assumes that to mean CCW permit.
        But the reporter is referring to the Handgun safety permit.

        They know this trick well... they just say the word "permit" and every dummy thinks the guy could pack...

        Comment

        • #5
          trinydex
          Veteran Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 4720

          the first sentence says it all... this person is a total moron that cannot reason with any mental sophistication.

          yes, all the mass murderers were legally entitled to their guns. so is the writer, so is anyone else who hasn't committed a crime yet... SO WHAT?

          perhaps we should start locking him up and cutting off his tongue and typing piggies because he may write something someday that will physically harm his wah wah constituents.

          it is not just true for guns but anyone in the united states is "entitled" to any number of crimes for their first offense. you can't stop someone's first offense by preemptively removing all their rights, well you can, it's just not legal, moral, ethical or correct.

          Comment

          • #6
            Nevermore
            Member
            • Jun 2008
            • 256

            Here's the incorrect part:
            They had more in common than unleashing carnage — nearly every gunman in this monthlong series of mass killings was legally entitled to fire his weapons.
            He didn't have the legal right to fire his weapons at people. Targets, sure. Ownership, sure. (I read he was a naturalized US citizen, so he had the same rights as anyone else.) But all of that is largely irrelevant, because nobody has a legal right to shoot strangers.

            Disclaimer: The poster is not responsible for any damage to the reader's keyboard, monitor, or dignity as a result of this post's comments.
            "I am a sinner that does not expect forgiveness. But I am not a government official." Francis Wolcott (Deadwood)

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1