We get a lot of threads where OP asks what his first gun should be. I have always believed that someone getting their first gun should really start with a .22 LR for cost of weapon and cost of ammo. All the basics and beyond can be learned on a .22 and recoil is pitiful, which helps relax the new shooter.
Every friend that has ever asked my advice basically scoffs when I suggest a .22 and on the forums it seems few people recommend .22 LR for a first gun when these threads show up.
I also tend to recommend that people start with a rifle before a pistol, since the sight radius is more friendly to new shooters. This also often gets ignored because people usually talk to me after seeing some kind of John Wick movie, and want a Glock 17 or a 1911.
I understand a .22 rifle or pistol isn't likely going to fill the shoes needed for HD, hunting, competition, etc... but most people buying their first gun are really just getting a range gun.
So what says Cal Guns? Is it really beneficial at all to start with the .22LR or am I just stuck on old hearsay?
Every friend that has ever asked my advice basically scoffs when I suggest a .22 and on the forums it seems few people recommend .22 LR for a first gun when these threads show up.
I also tend to recommend that people start with a rifle before a pistol, since the sight radius is more friendly to new shooters. This also often gets ignored because people usually talk to me after seeing some kind of John Wick movie, and want a Glock 17 or a 1911.
I understand a .22 rifle or pistol isn't likely going to fill the shoes needed for HD, hunting, competition, etc... but most people buying their first gun are really just getting a range gun.
So what says Cal Guns? Is it really beneficial at all to start with the .22LR or am I just stuck on old hearsay?

), get what you like.
Comment