Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Breaking Down The US Army’s Sub Compact Weapon Program

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Yodaman
    replied
    Go Sig!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • mlevans66
    replied
    Originally posted by njineermike
    I'll take one of each and an order of fries.

    To go.


    I think we need to start a business designing weapons for the government. That's some serious cheddar they're throwing around.
    It is and you know they gonna get them for cheaper.

    Leave a comment:


  • njineermike
    replied
    I'll take one of each and an order of fries.

    To go.


    I think we need to start a business designing weapons for the government. That's some serious cheddar they're throwing around.

    Leave a comment:


  • mlevans66
    replied
    BREAKING: Army Confirms 6 Sub Compact Weapon Contracts

    The US Army's Contracting Command has announced the award of six separate Fixed Priced, Full and Open Competition Prototype OTA's confirming earlier reports. The successful vendors will now provide the Army with the 10 testing an evaluation weapons needed for the programme's testing phase.


    Hi folk. I'm CGs mlevans66. You may remember me from such threads as

    NEW M&P 2.0 45
    STUPID ME FOR THE WRONG BARREL
    AND THE FAV

    Breaking down the US Armys Sub Compact Weapon Program.

    We they have made their choice below. Lets discuss!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • beanz2
    replied
    Originally posted by mlevans66
    Originally posted by JTROKS
    And the winner is... drumroll...

    Sig MPX!!!
    Pretty much but the B&T is a legit weapon system.
    Yup, Sig winning it is a given.

    B&T doesn't even have US manufacturing capability. Might as well, we don't want to see a repeat of the Sig experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • mlevans66
    replied
    Oh that's a good choice

    Leave a comment:


  • mlevans66
    replied
    Originally posted by frankm
    Just build grease guns.
    Because they make better guns now.

    Leave a comment:


  • 1911su16b870
    replied
    Seems to me this is a no brain-er with the acceptance of the the P320...



    Leave a comment:


  • Dan_Eastvale
    replied
    Originally posted by frankm
    Just build grease guns.
    My gosh no.... that would save thousands per unit.. can't do that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mute
    replied
    Some of the companies on the list doesn't even appear to have any guns that matches the criteria.

    Leave a comment:


  • mlevans66
    replied
    Originally posted by JTROKS
    And the winner is... drumroll...

    Sig MPX!!!
    Pretty much but the B&T is a legit weapon system.

    Leave a comment:


  • JTROKS
    replied
    And the winner is... drumroll...

    Sig MPX!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Subotai
    replied
    Just build grease guns.

    Leave a comment:


  • mlevans66
    replied
    They will always just for that steady military cash flow.

    Leave a comment:


  • BarrettM99
    replied
    The process has become such a cluster**** that it’s a miracle companies even take them seriously anymore.
    Last edited by BarrettM99; 09-18-2018, 8:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
UA-8071174-1