FBI ****s up.......again.

[ACfixer]

I see. So by your logic, since he “seemed like a bad guy” but was never charged or convicted of a crime, the FBI is responsible even tho this isn’t their jurisdiction and the police didn’t act on whatever info they had.

Sorry but if you advocate that not committing a crime 37 times (no charge or conviction) is grounds for taking his guns away, then go live in a communist country where that kind of crap happens all the time.

If the police visited that many times and saw nothing worthy of arrest or that warranted further search, that’s not the FBIs fault. You sound like one of those anti 2A gun grabbers who want to take everyone’s guns away if they simply look creepy. And wile you’re at it, you kick the FBI a few times because you’re still pissed that Clinton wasn’t charged. Trump won, get over it.

Personally, if I decide you’re a creep and report you a whole bunch of times in hopes of getting your guns taken away, you’d change your tune real quick.

Show me in any post where I said his guns should have been taken. You accused me of it three times, so surely you can show me where I said it.

Why did the FBI apologize for not following up? But yeah, you're right, the FBI handled the January 5th tip brilliantly.

[digelectric]

Show me in any post where I said his guns should have been taken. You accused me of it twice, so surely you can show me where I said it.

Why did the FBI apologize for not following up? But yeah, you're right, the FBI handled the January 5th tip brilliantly.

[ACfixer]

If you aren’t advocating an arrest or confiscation, then what the hell do you think the FBI should have done?

They should have done what the FBI does (or is supposed to do) when they suspect someone might commit a crime of that magnitude. Read back through my posts, in short since they should have interrogated him and assess the level of threat and the credibility of the tip. Let him know in no uncertain terms that his every move was being watched. You know, intimidate the piss out of the little cockroach. If a hotline tip saying he was going to slaughter the schools PLUS the entire red flag history didn't warrant at least a visit, what does?

[digelectric]

They should have done what the FBI does (or is supposed to do) when they suspect someone might commit a crime of that magnitude. Read back through my posts, in short since they should have interrogated him and assess the level of threat and the credibility of the tip. Let him know in no uncertain terms that his every move was being watched. You know, intimidate the piss out of the little cockroach. If a hotline tip saying he was going to slaughter the schools PLUS the entire red flag history didn't warrant at least a visit, what does?