CA compliance kit?

[Propforce]

https://www.calcompliancekits.com/order-1781170018201919

What do you think? Will this satisfies the featureless requirement?

[Cokebottle]

That's not featureless.

That is a magazine lock that meets the current definition of "Fixed magazine"

[solidfreshdope]

I was checking this out for a new build in the future: https://www.riflegear.com/p-8397-rif...kit-alpha.aspx


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Propforce]

That's not featureless.

That is a magazine lock that meets the current definition of "Fixed magazine"

https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/regs/genchar2

[Propforce]

I was checking this out for a new build in the future: https://www.riflegear.com/p-8397-rif...kit-alpha.aspx


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Thanks for the link. This looks like it will work!

[Cokebottle]

https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/regs/genchar2

Correct.
It's a minor point, but a matter of using terms accurately that have been coined over the last 15 years to avoid confusion.

When you say "featureless", it is generally understood to have no "evil features" AND have a detachable magazine.
When someone is talking about the new laws and says they are going to avoid registration by "going featureless", this is what they mean.

[Robert1234]

There's no better grip-fin than the Exile Machine Backfin https://www.amazon.com/Exile-Machine.../dp/B07145KZQ1

Or one of the newfangled, non-pistol grip grips like Resurgent Arms https://resurgentarms.com/

Are either of these better than a standard pistol grip? No. But they keep you're gun from being super dangerous to bliss-ninnies, and allow you to use the gun as it was intended (mostly), without registering it with the very people who are trying to disarm you.

Mag locks that require you to open the gun before being able to drop a magazine sound like a good idea (to some), until you get a jam and can't drop the magazine because the bolt is not fully shut and you CANNOT OPEN THE GUN. In other words, they're the opposite of a good idea. Which is a bad idea.

[Kellon]

[Cokebottle]

It would be too expensive and/or not sell well enough to justify the inventory tracking.

If it were not a high-end, name-brand upper, it would not sell well. If it were, the whole kit would be very expensive, as Thordsen would be yet another middle-man between the manufacturer and customer.

For a market limited to those in California who want the Thordsen stock, which is a very small percentage of California black-rifle owners.
The original U15 stock was only on the market for a few years, it's been pretty much impossible to find since 2010. The same will likely be true of Thordsen.

[Propforce]

Correct.
It's a minor point, but a matter of using terms accurately that have been coined over the last 15 years to avoid confusion.

When you say "featureless", it is generally understood to have no "evil features" AND have a detachable magazine.
When someone is talking about the new laws and says they are going to avoid registration by "going featureless", this is what they mean.

Yah, I see. Thanks for the explanation

[Arnovations]

All we carry is CA compliant items. We have a variety of kits.

[heidad01]

All we carry is CA compliant items. We have a variety of kits.

Are all these items (for conversion to featureless) approved by CA doj?

Mainly, the pistol grip replacements and forward grips?