Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Question: Home Defense Ballistics

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • butlers
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 754

    Question: Home Defense Ballistics

    All,

    Multi-part ballistics questions (and hopefully, discussion):

    **********

    QUESTION #1

    Are my numbers/categories generally correct?

    Super Low Weight (<25 gr), Low Velocity (~1000 ft/s):
    individual pellet of #4 Birdshot (~3 gr, ~1250 ft/s)
    individual pellet of #4 Buck (~20 gr, ~1250 ft/s)

    Super Low Weight (<25 gr), Medium Velocity (~2000 ft/s):
    .17 HMR (17 gr, ~2500 ft/s)
    5.7x28mm (31 gr, ~2300 ft/s)

    Super Low Weight (<25 gr), High Velocity (~3000 ft/s):
    .17 Hornet (25 gr, ~3000 ft/s)
    .17 Winchester Super Magnum (25 gr, ~2600 ft/s)

    Super Low Weight (<25 gr), Super High Velocity (~4000 ft/s):
    .17 Remington (25 gr, ~4000 ft/s)

    Low Weight (~50 gr), Low Velocity (~1000 ft/s):
    individual pellet of 00 Buck (~60 gr, ~1200 ft/s)
    .22 LR (40 gr, ~1200 ft/s)

    Low Weight (~50 gr), Medium Velocity (~2000 ft/s):
    .22 WMR (40 gr, ~2000 ft/s)

    Low Weight (~50 gr), High Velocity (~3000 ft/s):
    .22 Hornet (40 gr, ~2800 ft/s)
    .223/5.56x45mm (55 gr, ~3200 ft/s)
    5.45x39mm (60 gr, ~2900 ft/s)
    .243 Winchester (75 gr, ~3400 ft/s)

    Low Weight (~50 gr), Super High Velocity (~4000 ft/s):
    .204 Ruger (40 gr, ~3900 ft/s)
    .223 WSSM (55 gr, ~3800 ft/s)
    .243 WSSM (55 gr, ~4000 ft/s)

    Medium Weight (~100 gr), Low Velocity (~1000 ft/s):
    .380 ACP (95 gr, ~1000 ft/s)
    .38 spl (115gr, ~1000 ft/s)
    9x19mm (115 gr, ~1200 ft/s)

    Medium Weight (~100 gr), Medium Velocity (~2000 ft/s):
    .30 Carbine (~110 gr, ~2000 ft/s)
    7.62x39mm (122 gr, ~2300 ft/s)
    .300 Blackout (125 gr, ~2200 ft/s)

    Medium Weight (~100 gr), High Velocity (~3000 ft/s):
    .25 WSSM (115gr, ~3000 ft/s)
    .25-06 (115gr, ~3000 ft/s)
    6.5mm Grendel (123 gr, ~2600 ft/s)
    6.8 SPC (110gr, ~2600 ft/s)
    .30 Remington (125 gr, ~2800 ft/s)
    .270 Winchester (130 gr, ~3000 ft/s)

    Medium Weight (~100 gr), Super High Velocity (~4000 ft/s):
    None?

    High Weight (~150 gr), Low Velocity (~1000 ft/s):
    .357 magnum (158 gr, ~1250 ft/s)
    .40SW (165 gr, ~1000 ft/s)
    10mm Auto (180 gr, ~1300 ft/s)
    .45 ACP (230 gr, ~800 ft/s)
    .44 Magnum (~240 gr, ~1400 ft/s)

    High Weight (~150 gr), Medium Velocity (~2000 ft/s):
    None?

    High Weight (~150 gr), High Velocity (~3000 ft/s):
    .300 Savage (150 gr, ~2700 ft/s)
    .300 OSSM (150 gr, ~3000 ft/s)
    .308/7.62x51mm (147 gr, ~2700 ft/s)
    .30-06/7.62x63mm (150 gr, ~2900 ft/s)
    .300 Win Mag (180 gr, ~3000 ft/s)

    High Weight (~150 gr), Super High Velocity (~4000 ft/s):
    None?

    Super High Weight (>250 gr), Low Velocity (~1000 ft/s):
    .454 Casull (400 gr, ~1400 ft/s)

    Super High Weight (>250 gr), Medium Velocity (~2000 ft/s):
    12 gauge slug (300 gr, ~2000 ft/s)
    .450 Bushmaster (250 gr, ~2200 ft/s)
    .458 SOCOM (300 gr, ~1900 ft/s)
    .50 Beowulf (325 gr, ~2000 ft/s)
    .45-70 (300 gr, ~2000 ft/s)
    .50-90 Sharps (440 gr, ~1800 ft/s)

    Super High Weight (>250 gr), High Velocity (~3000 ft/s):
    .50 BMG (700 gr, ~3000 ft/s)

    Super High Weight (>250 gr), Super High Velocity (~4000 ft/s):
    OK, we're getting into GAU-8/A Avenger territory here....

    **********

    QUESTION #2

    So if I want a light bullet (less than 65 grains) that travels very fast (2000 ft/s and up) to use for home defense (see footnote below) -- and that won't break my budget -- what are my options?

    Too light?
    .17 HMR (17 gr, ~2500 ft/s)
    .17 Winchester Super Magnum (25 gr, ~2600 ft/s)
    5.7x28mm (31 gr, ~2300 ft/s)
    .22 WMR (40 gr, ~2000 ft/s)

    Bordering on too heavy?
    .243 Winchester (75 gr, ~3400 ft/s)

    Too expensive/hard to find?
    .17 Remington (25 gr, ~4000 ft/s)
    .17 Hornet (25 gr, ~3000 ft/s)
    .22 Hornet (40 gr, ~2800 ft/s)
    .204 Ruger (40 gr, ~3900 ft/s)
    .223 WSSM (55 gr, ~3800 ft/s)
    .243 WSSM (55 gr, ~4000 ft/s)

    Just right?
    .223/5.56x45mm (55 gr, ~3200 ft/s)
    5.45x39mm (60 gr, ~2900 ft/s)

    I don't want to get into a caliber war. I'm genuinely trying to understand what else is out there that mimics .223/5.56x45mm performance -- light (but not too light) and very fast.

    Respectfully,
    Butlers

    **********

    P.S. Footnote on Home Defense:

    Arguing about whether .223/5.56x45mm is appropriate for home-defense is not the intended purpose of this thread.

    That being said, I think it's been well-established that 223/5.56x45 is ideal for that purpose. That makes intuitive sense when you look at Delta/CAG, DEVGRU, HRT, etc. I'm not talking about Soldiers/Marines who have to be able to do both indoor (clearing houses) and outdoor (engaging targets far away) work; I'm talking about Tier 1 SOF badasses whose sole purpose in life is to shoot terrorists in the face across the length of a room (and not hit hostages tied up behind the wall). They do what they do primarily with modern carbines, not pistol-caliber SMGs nor shotguns.

    But you don't have to listen to me:

    US Army Sergeant Major Lamb (former Delta/CAG): "Statements are made that the shotgun or pistol should be used because of the over-penetration problem with 5.56 carbine ammunition. This could not be further from the truth. If you conduct a little research you will find that numerous law enforcement departments, to include the FBI, have proven this to be false in most cases. The fact of the matter is that many of these bullets will penetrate numerous walls, but standard 5.56 loadings are the least of your worries when compared to pistol and shotgun fodder, which continue to take top honors in the category of over-penetration."
    We sat down with one of the nation’s elite combat veterans, now a renowned tactical trainer, and asked him to explain why his choice for the best home-defense tool is the “general-purpose rifle,” America’s favorite, the AR platform in .223 Rem.


    Old_Painless (certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Firearms Defense, and Home Firearms Safety Instructor): "Common pistol rounds easily penetrated all 4 walls spaced out at room distances. This is a critical issue. Think about the inside of your house and imagine if you shot through 4 walls. Could you hit a loved one? Know your target and what is behind it....The 5.56 rounds deviated greatly from the original flight path once they started tumbling. This occurred after the second wall."
    Since we started this project, many people have asked, "Why don't you fill the walls with insulation before you shoot them? Maybe it would make a difference." Well, the standard answer is, "Interior walls, at least here in Texas, are not insulated. Only exterior walls are insulated." But…..who...


    James Tarr (former police officer; contributing editor for Guns and Ammo):


    Tiger McKee (adjunct instructor at Thunder Ranch):
    When discussing firearms for self-defense the AR-15 carbine may be the ideal home defense gun. Renowned firearms trainer Tiger McKee explains why.


    Tom McHale (contributor at AmmoLand and OutdoorHub):


    Caleb Lee (NRA Certified Basic Pistol & Personal Protection Inside The Home Instructor):
    If you listen to the mainstream media, then the standard 5.56 NATO/.223 Remington cartridges the AR-15 shoots are “high powered assault weapon” rounds that have no place in civilian hands. (I hope you are catching the sarcasm as I’m pouring it on) Yet, as we’ve discussed previously, the AR-15 is a GREAT choice for Home […]


    Dr. Gary Williams (ballistics expert): "Since all of the 5.56 mm/.223 bullets fired through the interior wall had significantly less penetration than 9 mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, and 12 ga. shotgun projectiles which were fired through an interior wall, stray 5.56 mm/.223 bullets seem to offer a reduced risk of injuring innocent bystanders and an inherent reduced risk of civil litigation in situations where bullets miss their intended target and enter or exit structures. As such, 5.56mm/.223 caliber weapons may be safer to use in CQB situations and crowded urban environments than service caliber handguns or 12 ga. weapons."
    Read: AR vs. Shotgun for home defense. Again. (2 of 2) from Aaron Cowan on February 5, 2014 for Recoil.
    Last edited by butlers; 08-01-2018, 12:30 PM. Reason: added more calibers/rounds to the list
    "The nation that will insist on drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking done by cowards." William Francis Butler (not Thucydides)
  • #2
    8886
    Banned
    • Aug 2011
    • 1730

    Which ever one you shoot the best.

    Comment

    • #3
      butlers
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 754

      Originally posted by 8886
      Which ever one you shoot the best.
      Thank you for your post. I don't suppose you have any thoughts/responses to my specific questions?

      QUESTION #1: Are my numbers/categories generally correct?

      QUESTION #2: If I want a light bullet (less than 65 grains) that travels very fast (2000 ft/s and up), what are my options? Am I limited to .223/5.56x45mm and 5.45x39mm?
      Last edited by butlers; 11-22-2017, 1:40 PM.
      "The nation that will insist on drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking done by cowards." William Francis Butler (not Thucydides)

      Comment

      • #4
        strakill
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2011
        • 1484

        Originally posted by butlers
        Thank you for your post. I don't suppose you have any thoughts/responses to my specific questions?

        QUESTION #1: Are my numbers/categories generally correct?

        QUESTION #2: If I want a light bullet (less than 65 grains) that travels very fast (2000 ft/s and up), what are my options? Am I limited to .223/5.56x45mm and 5.45x39mm?
        Question 1: Generally speaking your correct. Grossly over-complicated for my taste but good on you for doing your work.

        Question 2: 5.45X39 If you don't wan't 5.56. There is not much else out there that is realistic besides maybe the .17 Winchester super magnum.

        Edit - I meant to say categorized rather than complicated.
        Last edited by strakill; 11-22-2017, 1:52 PM.
        Originally posted by superhondaz50
        I should note, I have a hookup..., just trying to determine the cost to put it in.
        Originally posted by beerman
        ...He comes out while I'm at work to **** the wife..I shall name him Sancho.

        Comment

        • #5
          ChuckDizzle
          Banned
          • Dec 2013
          • 4398

          Just use surplus 5.56 xm193 with a cannelure.

          Comment

          • #6
            butlers
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2012
            • 754

            Originally posted by strakill
            Question 1: Generally speaking your correct. Grossly over-categorized for my taste but good on you for doing your work.

            Question 2: 5.45X39 If you don't wan't 5.56. There is not much else out there that is realistic besides maybe the .17 Winchester super magnum.
            strakill,

            Thank you. That was the kind of specific feedback/criticism/insight I was hoping to get.

            So, if I want all of this:

            US Army Sergeant Major Lamb (former Delta/CAG): "Statements are made that the shotgun or pistol should be used because of the over-penetration problem with 5.56 carbine ammunition. This could not be further from the truth. If you conduct a little research you will find that numerous law enforcement departments, to include the FBI, have proven this to be false in most cases. The fact of the matter is that many of these bullets will penetrate numerous walls, but standard 5.56 loadings are the least of your worries when compared to pistol and shotgun fodder, which continue to take top honors in the category of over-penetration."
            We sat down with one of the nation’s elite combat veterans, now a renowned tactical trainer, and asked him to explain why his choice for the best home-defense tool is the “general-purpose rifle,” America’s favorite, the AR platform in .223 Rem.


            Old_Painless (certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Firearms Defense, and Home Firearms Safety Instructor): "Common pistol rounds easily penetrated all 4 walls spaced out at room distances. This is a critical issue. Think about the inside of your house and imagine if you shot through 4 walls. Could you hit a loved one? Know your target and what is behind it....The 5.56 rounds deviated greatly from the original flight path once they started tumbling. This occurred after the second wall."
            Since we started this project, many people have asked, "Why don't you fill the walls with insulation before you shoot them? Maybe it would make a difference." Well, the standard answer is, "Interior walls, at least here in Texas, are not insulated. Only exterior walls are insulated." But…..who...


            James Tarr (former police officer; contributing editor for Guns and Ammo): "Proponents of the pistol for home defense like to think that because it’s 'just' a pistol round, overpenetration really won’t be an issue. Such is not the case. Drywall sheets and hollow-core doors (which are what you’ll find in the majority of homes and apartments in this country) offer almost no resistance to bullets....For years many people just assumed they knew what would happen to a rifle bullet fired indoors—it would go through every wall available and then exit the building. While armor-piercing and FMJ ammunition is specifically designed to do this, extensive testing has shown that light, extremely fast-moving .223 projectiles (including FMJs) often fragment when they hit a barrier as soft as thin plywood."


            Tiger McKee (adjunct instructor at Thunder Ranch): "The .223/5.56 is moving at around 3,000 feet per second, and while it isn’t magic bullet, it’s a far cry better than any pistol round. Another advantage of the .223/5.56 is its limited penetration. The shape and velocity of the round cause it to immediately expend or dissipate its energy once it strikes something."
            When discussing firearms for self-defense the AR-15 carbine may be the ideal home defense gun. Renowned firearms trainer Tiger McKee explains why.


            Tom McHale (contributor at AmmoLand and OutdoorHub): "The pistol rounds were seemingly unaffected by the drywall and/or wood barriers. There was no observable deviation or fragmentation of the 9mm projectiles. You’d be safe counting on a pistol round to keep going, and going, and going. After all, premium pistol ammunition is designed to expand, and lose energy, when striking liquid-based targets—not walls. The full metal jacket .223 rounds tended to tumble rather than break apart when they encountered barriers."


            Caleb Lee (NRA Certified Basic Pistol & Personal Protection Inside The Home Instructor): "FBI and Independent Testing Has Consistently Shown .223/5.56 NATO Fired From AR-15’s Do Not Over Penetrate More Than Pistol/Shotgun."
            If you listen to the mainstream media, then the standard 5.56 NATO/.223 Remington cartridges the AR-15 shoots are “high powered assault weapon” rounds that have no place in civilian hands. (I hope you are catching the sarcasm as I’m pouring it on) Yet, as we’ve discussed previously, the AR-15 is a GREAT choice for Home […]


            Dr. Gary Williams (ballistics expert): "Since all of the 5.56 mm/.223 bullets fired through the interior wall had significantly less penetration than 9 mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, and 12 ga. shotgun projectiles which were fired through an interior wall, stray 5.56 mm/.223 bullets seem to offer a reduced risk of injuring innocent bystanders and an inherent reduced risk of civil litigation in situations where bullets miss their intended target and enter or exit structures. As such, 5.56mm/.223 caliber weapons may be safer to use in CQB situations and crowded urban environments than service caliber handguns or 12 ga. weapons."
            http://www.recoilweb.com/ar-vs-shotg...f-2-39203.html
            Then my two best options are .223/5.56x45mm and 5.45x39mm. I can go lighter (as you say, maybe .17 Winchester Super Magnum -- I didn't even know about this one, so thank you; gonna add that to my original post) or I can go esoteric (e.g. .223 WSSM), but for all intents and purposes, ammunition rounds designed for the AR-15 and AK-74 are the way to go.

            Respectfully,
            butlers
            Last edited by butlers; 11-22-2017, 2:54 PM.
            "The nation that will insist on drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking done by cowards." William Francis Butler (not Thucydides)

            Comment

            • #7
              strakill
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2011
              • 1484

              Originally posted by butlers
              strakill,

              Thank you. That was the kind of specific feedback/criticism/insight I was hoping to get.

              So, if I want all of this:



              Then I'm pretty much limited to .223/5.56x45mm or 5.45x39mm....

              Respectfully,
              butlers
              I just edited my last post to include the .17 Winchester Super Mag. I am no where near the end all be all of caliber guru's but realistically speaking you are correct. Having said that I'm sure there are some wildcat cartridges out there that will fit the bill but do you want to go that route? I don't remember if you included the .204 ruger in your list.
              Originally posted by superhondaz50
              I should note, I have a hookup..., just trying to determine the cost to put it in.
              Originally posted by beerman
              ...He comes out while I'm at work to **** the wife..I shall name him Sancho.

              Comment

              • #8
                butlers
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2012
                • 754

                Originally posted by strakill
                I am no where near the end all be all of caliber guru's but realistically speaking you are correct. Having said that I'm sure there are some wildcat cartridges out there that will fit the bill but do you want to go that route?
                Got it. I've only been shooting for about 10 years, so I'm definitely not a caliber guru either -- was just wondering if there was some major alternative to the .223/5.56x45 that I was overlooking. Sounds like 5.45x39 is pretty much it.

                Thank you for taking the time to read and comment. I appreciate it.
                "The nation that will insist on drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking done by cowards." William Francis Butler (not Thucydides)

                Comment

                • #9
                  elSquid
                  In Memoriam
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 11844

                  Originally posted by butlers
                  Got it. I've only been shooting for about 10 years, so I'm definitely not a caliber guru either -- was just wondering if there was some major alternative to the .223/5.56x45 that I was overlooking. Sounds like 5.45x39 is pretty much it.
                  .

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1