How did the magazine release button escape featureless?

[951temec]

FGG is a prime suspect.

need more tinfoil?

[MaHoTex]

Nope.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[CALI-gula]

As if no gun enthusiast ever contemplated that before... like going back to SB-23 and the features ban nearly 18 years ago - except legislators that know nothing about firearms.

But sure, educate them just to appear reverent or bright.

.

[951temec]

As if no gun enthusiast ever contemplated that before... like going back to SB-23 and the features ban nearly 18 years ago - except legislators that know nothing about firearms.

But sure, educate them just to appear reverent or bright.

.

except they knew what a galil was, what a ar-70 was before the internet was invented

who century was (much smaller)

banned norinco type 56's before most people even knew what they were

yeah totally clue less people am i right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberti-Roos_Assault_Weapons_Control_Act_of_1989

[Lonestargrizzly]

I built a fatherless rifle.
It did poorly in school, and now it lives in my basement.

[951temec]

i don't think losing all ground and trying to gain it back is a sound strategy -- Chicago and DC have had pistol bans since the 70s, they're JUST getting extremely expensive process and limited options back 4 DECADES later...

the only positive we've gotten, well ever, is OLL. nothing else -- mag capacity, roster, ccw, open-carry, these have all been getting MORE restrictive over the past two decades

We differ from the liberals in that we're not selfish, the fight is for our kids not ourselves

[CALI-gula]

except they knew what a galil was, what a ar-70 was before the internet was invented

who century was (much smaller)

banned norinco type 56's before most people even knew what they were

yeah totally clue less people am i right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert...ol_Act_of_1989

If you knew anything about this topic matter other than what you could garner from Wikipedia, which only cites what was named for banning and not how it came about, rendering both your reply and the Wikipedia link you crapped out in your post entirely useless for your rebuttal - ( as an aside, many of us here on Calguns.net were actually involved with the situation at that time, and weren't sucking a pacifier as it all went down) - you would then know that the information gleaned in order to manuscript and indoctrinate Robert-Roos was had from gun owners themselves in conjunction with data/advisory in discussions with the ASSC and details extracted from the likes of Richard Feldman (even if unwittingly, who believes in 'compromises' and sees the NRA as a problem) identifying what they believed at that time to be certain firearms that could easily be converted to fully-automatic capability.

55 guns by name were identified, because that is what was provided to legislators BY GUN ENTHUSIASTS, albeit useless as all that was done inside of the next few years was to change the name of such models; which again proves legislators authoring bans know nothing on which they espouse.

The list essentially came out of a "strategy paper" entitled "Assault Weapons: Analysis, New Research, and Legislation" published by John Sugarmann, the former spokesman for the National Coalition to Ban Handguns then head of a new organization called the 'Violence Policy Center'. It was written after Patrick Purdy went berserk in January of 1989 in Stockton, California, utilizing a Chinese AK-47 clone to shoot up an elementary school killing 5 kids and wounding 29 others.

The information derived to write that ridiculous fabricated manifest with an ulterior motive to usher in a wish to ban all firearms but with a 'compromising' end-game in hopes to lead to banning semi-automatic handguns and high-capacity magazines... came directly from gun enthusiasts and not the legislators that propped up their turds of bans derived from it.

So again, as is being discussed here, the identification as such came from within our own ranks, not from the legislators themselves. Legislators were totally clueless until gun enthusiasts gave them the clues on a platter, who were likely subdued by their own pride to look so smart, so savvy, so wise, who were so infatuated with what they thought of themselves to be 'ingenious' on the topic-matter of firearms that they were willing to be fooled by flattery to give expert witness for free to such legislators.

Don't try to educate someone on the matter that stood upright fighting those measures in person, long before there was an internet to halfass advise YOU about its history, in the same way the internet is now used to halfass advise legislators about firearms.

.