Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Hickock 45, gun culture 2.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #91
    HectorEscaton
    Member
    • Mar 2017
    • 155

    Originally posted by IVC
    I am neither religious nor do I claim anything about the theory of evolution except that it is a theory.

    Am I wrong?
    What's that quote from the Big Lebowski...?

    Comment

    • #92
      Danodog
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      CGN Contributor
      • May 2013
      • 2530

      Ah the innocent thread that causes Calguns members to eat their own......
      Calguns Contributor
      NRA Benefactor Member
      CRPA Member
      San Diego County Gun Owners Patriot Member
      What have you done for 2A lately?

      Comment

      • #93
        ChuckDizzle
        Banned
        • Dec 2013
        • 4398

        Originally posted by IVC
        Nah, I stopped bothering with context when saying "it's a theory" earns one the label of being a creationist.
        I never said that, read it again slowly and carefully.

        Comment

        • #94
          FeuerFrei
          Calguns Addict
          • Aug 2008
          • 7455

          Originally posted by Danodog
          Ah the innocent thread that causes Calguns members to eat their own......
          Ain't it the truth.

          I jumped off this train when I saw the bridge ahead was just catching fire.

          Fully involved now and soon to be locked by the local pezzonovante.

          Sent using a long string and 2 Dixie cups

          Comment

          • #95
            SWalt
            Calguns Addict
            • Jan 2012
            • 8629

            I don't know about anyone else but I'm looking for the untaxed alcohol stores here in CA. I can't believe I missed those. Any in the Riverside area?
            ^^^The above is just an opinion.

            NRA Patron Member
            CRPA 5 yr Member

            "...which from their verbosity, their endless tautologies, their involutions of case within case, and parenthesis within parenthesis, and their multiplied efforts at certainty by saids and aforesaids, by ors and by ands, to make them more plain, do really render them more perplexed and incomprehensible, not only to common readers, but to lawyers themselves. " - Thomas Jefferson

            Comment

            • #96
              cvigue
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2015
              • 1525

              Originally posted by L84CABO
              Here's where he loses me. The politics matter! If you love guns...and even if you love gun rights...but you voted for Hillary Clinton...you are the enemy. You can't say you are pro gun, pro 2A, pro BoR, and then vote for people who are trying to eliminate 2A at every turn. Now granted if you like guns, there's more hope for you that you will one day see the error of your voting ways. But until that actually happens, you are still THE PROBLEM.
              Yeah, that's going to bring in a lot of people and convince them to rethink their ideas, excellent plan you hatched there, diabolical.

              Comment

              • #97
                IVC
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Jul 2010
                • 17594

                Originally posted by HectorEscaton
                What's that quote from the Big Lebowski...?
                Very well played. Very well indeed.
                sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

                Comment

                • #98
                  BigPun762
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 1411

                  Originally posted by osis32
                  then why don't you call it the fact of evolution? you should petition the scientific community to do so.
                  Because if you understand what a scientific theory truly means, there is no need to call it something else. A scientific theory is not the same as your own theory.

                  We also have "Newton's theory of gravitation" so do you believe gravity is also just a "theory" because of the word?
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • #99
                    cvigue
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2015
                    • 1525

                    Originally posted by BigPun762
                    We also have "Newton's theory of gravitation" so do you believe gravity is also just a "theory" because of the word?
                    Well, do you realize Newton's theory is incorrect?

                    Comment

                    • HectorEscaton
                      Member
                      • Mar 2017
                      • 155

                      Originally posted by SWalt
                      I don't know about anyone else but I'm looking for the untaxed alcohol stores here in CA. I can't believe I missed those. Any in the Riverside area?
                      Alcohol is so cheap in California compared to much of the rest of the country that it's the last thing I would complain about. I have relatives that buy booze at Costco here and fly back with it.

                      Comment

                      • HectorEscaton
                        Member
                        • Mar 2017
                        • 155

                        Originally posted by cvigue
                        Well, do you realize Newton's theory is incorrect?
                        As far as predicting the behavior of macroscopic objects goes, I think it's a little unfair to call it "incorrect." Incomplete is probably a better description. We still don't really know how gravity works.

                        Comment

                        • cvigue
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2015
                          • 1525

                          Originally posted by HectorEscaton
                          As far as predicting the behavior of macroscopic objects goes, I think it's a little unfair to call it "incorrect." Incomplete is probably a better description. We still don't really know how gravity works.
                          It's a model that approximates the actual observed behavior, but it's still wrong. Extrapolate that to the other argument as you see fit.

                          Comment

                          • Pardini
                            Senior Member
                            • May 2014
                            • 1204

                            Everybody has their own priorities. If the 2A is your number one priority your probably voting republican. If the 2A is your third or fourth priority you may be voting democrat.
                            Originally Posted by OCEquestrian View Post
                            Excellent! I am thinking about it as well and I only have 4 points and an unfortunate "match bump" up to expert classification where I am far less "competitive" with my peers there.

                            Comment

                            • champu
                              CGN Contributor
                              • Nov 2013
                              • 1981

                              Originally posted by IVC
                              ...yet you and a few others are trying to create a false equivalency with something you consider "a bad idea" in order to essentially say "well, the other side is doing it too."
                              I've not said or implied in any of my posts in this thread that anything is equivalently bad to what the Democrats do to the second amendment when they have control of legislative bodies.

                              I have to assume you just skimmed my posts quickly and would do the same to any further elaboration, so have a good weekend.

                              Comment

                              • HectorEscaton
                                Member
                                • Mar 2017
                                • 155

                                Originally posted by cvigue
                                It's a model that approximates the actual observed behavior, but it's still wrong. Extrapolate that to the other argument as you see fit.
                                That's all a theory ever is. Care to elaborate how it's wrong?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1