Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Smith and Wesson vs Ruger Corporation financial information

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jason Singh
    Member
    • Mar 2016
    • 286

    Smith and Wesson vs Ruger Corporation financial information

    Alright you guys, I was looking into investing into one of these firms. So I thought I would put this small little report together for you guys to view. This is just my opinion based on my opinion, this can be completely wrong. All this is data is publicly available information.

    Smith had total revenue of $872 million, while Ruger had total revenue of $654 million. By comparison Smith and Wesson is a bigger company that produces more total revenue then Ruger. Smith also has a higher net income then Ruger after expenses. (Chart 1 & 2)

    With that, Smith also produces more cash than Ruger. Keep in mind Net Income does not mean cash. Many companies have a negative Net Income but produce a positive inflow of cash. Smith has a positive cash flow from operations of $207 million, while Ruger has a Positive cash flow from operations of $103 million. This is very important, because cash is what a company needs to stay in business. Many billion dollar businesses have went out of business because they ran out of cash, and no bank would loan them more money. (Chart 3 & 4)

    The balance sheet tells us a story of what assets the company owns and what liabilities it owes.
    Smith and Wesson currently has $191 million in cash, and $59 million owed to them within 1 year for products sold. Smith is Very liquid. Smith currently has $77 million in inventory that has not been sold. They also have $135 million in Property, Plant & Equipment, this includes all the buildings, corporate offices, manufacturing equipment etc. Smith currently has $311 million in debt that it owes, and $122 million which is owed within 1 year, that is not bad at all. Again they have plenty of cash and cash owed to them.

    Ruger currently has $69 million in cash, and $71 million owed to them within 1 year. They have $37 million in Inventory, and have property, plant & equipment of $103 million. They only owe $88 million, and $82 million is owed within 1 year, Ruger is looking very strong right now. They don't have much debt after 1 year. Ruger is ran VERY efficiently. That is a HUGE plus for them. (Chart 5 & 6)

    Smith and Wesson has a contribution margin of 40%, while Ruger has a Contribution Margin of 33%.
    This means for every $1.00 they make on there product sales, Smith and Wesson makes $0.40 profit, and they pay $0.60 on manufacturing costs. Ruger makes $0.33 profit and pay $0.67 on manufacture cost.

    Overall, both of these companies are ran very well. Smith is the bigger company, but Ruger is growing and ran more efficient.


    Chart 1 & 2






    Chart 3 & 4






    Chart 5 & 6



  • #2
    AreWeFree
    Veteran Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 4558

    You forgot something very important;

    Smith & Wesson Holdings doesn't pay a dividend.
    Ruger pays 40% of profits as dividends.

    Comment

    • #3
      J Huan
      Banned
      • Dec 2016
      • 71

      ...and you also missed the biggest gun purchase rush in a generation.

      Comment

      • #4
        keenkeen
        Calguns Addict
        • May 2011
        • 6782

        Originally posted by J Huan
        ...and you also missed the biggest gun purchase rush in a generation.
        This...what is your investing strategy with these two?

        Buy high and sell low?
        "But far more numerous was the herd of such, Who think too little and who talk too much." -John Dryden

        Comment

        • #5
          Mitch
          Mostly Harmless
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Mar 2008
          • 6574

          Smith & Wesson are far more diversified in terms of markets than Ruger.

          Ruger is a gun company; Smith & Wesson own a variety of outdoors brands.
          Originally posted by cockedandglocked
          Getting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill.

          Comment

          • #6
            tpuig
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2005
            • 2163

            I bought Ruger and SWC back before the 2008 election. IIRC paid about $5/share or so for each. Something about not trusting any of the candidates... ;-)

            I'm biased, but think Ruger is the better company. Not sure where the stock will go, but they are still selling all the guns they can make as fast as they can...
            NRA LIFE Member

            Comment

            • #7
              Jason Singh
              Member
              • Mar 2016
              • 286

              Originally posted by keenkeen
              This...what is your investing strategy with these two?

              Buy high and sell low?
              Or sell High, and Buy low?

              Comment

              • #8
                Jason Singh
                Member
                • Mar 2016
                • 286

                Originally posted by Mitch
                Smith & Wesson are far more diversified in terms of markets than Ruger.

                Ruger is a gun company; Smith & Wesson own a variety of outdoors brands.
                I 100% agree with you

                Comment

                • #9
                  Jason Singh
                  Member
                  • Mar 2016
                  • 286

                  Originally posted by tpuig
                  I bought Ruger and SWC back before the 2008 election. IIRC paid about $5/share or so for each. Something about not trusting any of the candidates... ;-)

                  I'm biased, but think Ruger is the better company. Not sure where the stock will go, but they are still selling all the guns they can make as fast as they can...
                  I agree with you, I think Ruger is the better company(financially). They are ran very well. Yeah stock keep going up is hard as 50ish is pretty high, but never know, I remember when Facebook was 40, man those days.

                  And wow 5$ a share is insane, I wish I had that opportunity/knowledge. Wonder how many shares

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Jason Singh
                    Member
                    • Mar 2016
                    • 286

                    Originally posted by J Huan
                    ...and you also missed the biggest gun purchase rush in a generation.
                    I dont know how much a "gun rush" really affects these companies. It is hard to measure.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1