Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Clinton and the 2nd Amendment ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chasem5657
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 58

    Clinton and the 2nd Amendment ?

    Hi Lad's does anyone know what Clinton will do to the 2nd Amendment if she becomes president ? Will she Re-Instate the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban ?
  • #2
    POLICESTATE
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Apr 2009
    • 18185

    Hope you like muskets, because by the time she is done stacking SCOTUS and releasing executive orders on the subject that's about all you'll end up being able to have anymore.
    -POLICESTATE,
    In the name of the State, and of the School, and of the Infallible Science


    sigpic


    Government Official Lies
    . F r e e d o m . D i e s .

    Comment

    • #3
      Brush Guard
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2015
      • 888

      I just ordered another case of .50 cal lead round balls and 5 pounds of black powder. Just need to get 1,000 percussion caps.

      And in case we can no longer buy the percussion caps, I’ll be working on my flintlock skills this weekend.
      Stock up now….

      Comment

      • #4
        njineermike
        Calguns Addict
        • Dec 2010
        • 9784

        Originally posted by chasem5657
        Hi Lad's does anyone know what Clinton will do to the 2nd Amendment if she becomes president ? Will she Re-Instate the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban ?
        She can't introduce law or vote on it if she's elected President, but you can bet your bottom dollar she'll agree to it, push for it, and sign it when it crosses her desk. And this time there won't be a sunset clause.
        Originally posted by Kestryll
        Dude went full CNN...
        Peace, love, and heavy weapons. Sometimes you have to be insistent." - David Lee Roth

        Comment

        • #5
          tanks
          Veteran Member
          • Dec 2014
          • 4038

          Originally posted by chasem5657
          Hi Lad's does anyone know what Clinton will do to the 2nd Amendment if she becomes president ? Will she Re-Instate the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban ?
          Not directly. However, as more and more States implement restrictive gun laws her SCOTUS appointments will affirm those restrictions.
          "... when a man has shot an elephant his life is full"- John Alfred Jordan
          "A set of ivory tusks speaks of a life well lived." - Unknown

          Comment

          • #6
            Mitch
            Mostly Harmless
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Mar 2008
            • 6574

            Originally posted by chasem5657
            Hi Lad's does anyone know what Clinton will do to the 2nd Amendment if she becomes president ? Will she Re-Instate the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban ?
            Are you aware of how Separation of Powers works?

            Of course, the "Hi Lads" suggests you might not be a native American and so never went through the fifth grade here . . .

            Originally posted by tanks
            Not directly. However, as more and more States implement restrictive gun laws her SCOTUS appointments will affirm those restrictions.
            Most states are moving in the other direction.
            Last edited by Mitch; 10-17-2016, 9:43 AM.
            Originally posted by cockedandglocked
            Getting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill.

            Comment

            • #7
              alpha_romeo_XV
              Veteran Member
              • Jun 2006
              • 3067

              Haven't you heard her slogan "stronger together"? No need for guns in Utopia. And her mouth has said there is no justification for "military style weapons" in the hands "of the people".

              Comment

              • #8
                003
                Veteran Member
                • Jul 2010
                • 3436

                She is on record as indicating she will do everything in her power to limit the 2nd amendment. The specifics hardly matter. Pick and area involving guns, shooting, etc and she will do what she can to negatively impact it. One small example, her husband significantly increased FFL fees, and as a result, the number of FFL’s nationwide decreased. There are a great many things she can do to create problems for honest gun owners.

                Comment

                • #9
                  AceGirlsHusband
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 2651

                  She can't do anything without a majority vote in the Houses of Congress. However, SHE can pack the Court who interprets law, and there lies the land mine that can destroy the 2nd Amendment as it has been interpreted for some 230 years.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    71MUSTY
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Mar 2014
                    • 7029

                    She has proposed, National Background checks, No fly list ban, 25% sales tax on all gun related products, and yes AWB.

                    Other posters are right President can't write laws, but she can push for them and if she has a majority in Congress...

                    Plus like Obama she can create a ton of executive orders to infringe and make life difficult.

                    And on top of that she will appoint Supreme Court Judges who view the Constitution as a living document in need of updating to reflect Progressive Policies.
                    Only slaves don't need guns

                    Originally posted by epilepticninja
                    Americans vs. Democrats
                    We stand for the Anthem, we kneel for the cross


                    We already have the only reasonable Gun Control we need, It's called the Second Amendment and it's the government it controls.


                    What doesn't kill me, better run

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Mitch
                      Mostly Harmless
                      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 6574

                      Originally posted by AceGirlsHusband
                      She can't do anything without a majority vote in the Houses of Congress. However, SHE can pack the Court who interprets law, and there lies the land mine that can destroy the 2nd Amendment as it has been interpreted for some 230 years.
                      Actually, the Second Amendment has been interpreted in our favor by the Supreme Court for only about eight years, and since then lower courts have felt free to mostly ignore the Heller decision.

                      Court decisions generally follow societal consensus anyway. It's a false hope to put your trust in the courts. What must happen before we can expect repeated court victories is for the general public at large to embrace gun rights.

                      But since that would require gun rights advocates and shooting enthusiasts to get out of their comfort zones and actually engage in a polite and informative manner others who have different political and religious beliefs, different ethnic backgrounds, different worldviews, I guess it will never happen.
                      Originally posted by cockedandglocked
                      Getting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        cjc16
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2011
                        • 756

                        She'll do nothing good for gun owners.
                        Idiocity, That state of the mind which cannot perceive and embrace the data presented to it by the senses.

                        NRA - Life member
                        SAF - Life member
                        GOA - Member
                        CalgunsFoundation - Supporter

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          jeffyhog
                          Veteran Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 2759

                          She said at the last debate that she respects the 2nd Ammendment.

                          Bull*****

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Fastattack
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 1660

                            Make no mistake, as the new Queen of USA she will do anything and everything she possibly can to make the 2A insignificant regardless of the makeup of the congress. She is the enemy. Republicans in congress are spineless.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Brother_Hesekiel
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2012
                              • 771

                              The one "real" danger is a SCOTUS interpreting the 2nd Amendment differently, more in tune with the militia than anything else. All other steps will just make life more difficult. As Californians, our main problem are the anti-2A Democrats in Sacramento.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1