Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Interesting Read on Tracing Firearms

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hairball
    Senior Member
    • May 2013
    • 799

    Interesting Read on Tracing Firearms

  • #2
    pacrat
    I need a LIFE!!
    • May 2014
    • 10287

    Jeanne Marie Laskas can lick my sweaty gonads. Just another liberal turd pimping nationwide registration scheme.

    Comment

    • #3
      anothergunnut
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2006
      • 1819

      What a load of crap. They don't even mention the obvious part; the original purchaser is rarely the actual criminal. I'll bet that the gun traces are almost always a dead end. They made a big fuss over some high profile shootings where there was never a dispute over who the killer was such as the San Bernadino or Newtown killers; what value was the trace in those cases?
      Check back later for a witty comment.

      Comment

      • #4
        mycrstuff
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 1435

        I would like to know how many convictions have happened due to tracing. You never hear about anybody being convicted due to a gun being traced back to them.

        Comment

        • #5
          The Gleam
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Feb 2011
          • 13801

          Saw this earlier today, and the only interesting thing about it is the mis-information peddled as fact, and trying to impress upon the misinformed why all-out registration is necessary. The ruse portrayed about any difficulty in tracking down a firearm is quite melodramatic in its fabrication. Even the photo in the article is a biased attempt to imply that some little guy is pushing around massive paper records on a cart just to go through them to track a gun. It's crap.

          We all know, the the serial number isn't worth dick when the gun is stolen and used by the criminal or subsequent criminal that stole it - or they simply obliterated the serial number anyway.

          Hard left leaning article queen-screaming for registration. It's not very discreet or sly on the issue at all.
          -----------------------------------------------
          Originally posted by Librarian
          What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

          If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

          Comment

          • #6
            pacrat
            I need a LIFE!!
            • May 2014
            • 10287

            Originally posted by mycrstuff
            I would like to know how many convictions have happened due to tracing. You never hear about anybody being convicted due to a gun being traced back to them.

            It's extremely rare, but it does happen enough to be made a big deal out of in the Bias Stream Media.

            San Bernadino terrorist got the 2 rifles used from a dumb Ch!t neighbor, who bought them legally, then illegaly transfered them to terrorist. Terrorist bought pistols himself from FFL.

            Comment

            • #7
              GW
              I need a LIFE!!
              • May 2004
              • 16078

              Another load of libtard horse****.
              sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1