Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

When will firearm metals be upgraded?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    ziconceo
    Veteran Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 3269

    Originally posted by meaty-btz
    I've made ones as strong as a 45 and Railguns that are super-sonic. Its not hard.

    Power is only part of the problem. In coilguns you need a strong magnetic field, this is a combination of both power and the scale of the coils. That can be described as power and length of total wiring making up the coils. In the case of copper that is "unavoidable weight" and size. You can use finer wire and more current but you hit thermal load problems where you melt your coil packs with one shot.

    Small lightweight designs are out there already, they are even quite energy efficient, but they require the use of superconductors with their associated cooling needs, which is the same kind of cooling needs needed in fine-wire high current conventional coil packs to keep them from melting.

    Railguns still suffer from self-destruction and heavy rail erosion. The navy's railgun needs a new barrel after just about every shot still. If you've ever seen test firings and say, naww they are using conventional ballistics because of the huge muzzle flash and the fire leaking from every part of the barrel that is distorted and nearly flying apart with the shot. Nope, that is just high energy plasma generated by the railgun as part of it's firing. Which kind of goes back to the experiments in plasma powered guns where they worked on developing a propellant that would generate more power than modern gunpowders. The barrel pressures and plasma at those energy levels eroded the barrels too much. The idea was scrapped. The lower energy plasma that is the expanding gas in conventional firearms in certain rifles is already energetic enough to erode the hell out of the throat, you can imagine what happens when you step that up a few notches. Imagine the ignition energy being enough to melt the brass in the chamber kind of heat.

    Practical arms are still sci-fi in the sense of being able to replace current types of firearms. The science behind them is simple and settled and experimentally they are quite easy to make both effective and functional but production ready and general deployment? Unlikely.
    What's your opinion on a s-64 sky crane mounted 15,000 pound infrared death laser?
    I don't drink or Smoke. I spend my money on gunpowder and gasoline.

    Comment

    • #17
      Epaphroditus
      Veteran Member
      • Sep 2013
      • 4888

      If it ain't broke ...

      Sent from my SM-G360V using Tapatalk
      CA firearms laws timeline BLM land maps

      Comment

      • #18
        AceGirlsHusband
        Veteran Member
        • Jan 2013
        • 2651

        Our legislature feels the need to change our metallurgy, too. They wish all our firearms metal to be unobtanium.

        Comment

        • #19
          Fjold
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Oct 2005
          • 22908

          Originally posted by sealocan
          And to people who say you can't get high velocity without recoil look up a diagram on how are recoilless rifle works.
          it's really pretty interesting,
          or at least I thought so.

          all you have to figure out is how to direct an amount of gas pressure backwards as the bullet goes forward, which I admit isn't going to be easy from a pistol.

          But that's just one way to do it.
          You're going to get that mechanism in a snubbie?
          Frank

          One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




          Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

          Comment

          • #20
            russ69
            Calguns Addict
            • Nov 2009
            • 9348

            Originally posted by ziconceo
            We've been using relatively the same metals in gun barrels for decades...
            There is a reason for most of the material choices we use right now. Good engineering reasons. Rifle cartridges work in the 60,000 psi range. We can work at higher pressures than that but would you buy a rifle that costs 5,000 dollars to build and uses rounds that are 30 dollars each due to the cost of materials and the difficulties in manufacturing?
            sigpic

            Comment

            • #21
              Lonestargrizzly not a Cabinetguy
              Calguns Addict
              • Dec 2015
              • 6504

              Originally posted by Fjold
              You're going to get that mechanism in a snubbie?
              Using "Time And Relative Dimension In Space" technology.
              AKA "It's bigger on the inside."

              Comment

              • #22
                homelessdude
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Aug 2013
                • 2097

                A snub nosed 38 shooting a ss round at two thousand fps would exceed every pressure max out there. What happens when these rounds get fed into regular guns that were not built for them. Several lawsuits for missing fingers, hands, or eyes would put an end to that dream. There are plenty of uncomfortable guns to shoot out there already if that's what you want and they won't maim you. Not sure why you want the abuse but to each his own.

                Comment

                • #23
                  Barbarosa
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 2166

                  Wouldn't be available in CA even if they were made. That whole "Roster" thing.

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    SVT-40
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 12894

                    Originally posted by ziconceo
                    We've been using relatively the same metals in gun barrels for decades. It seems like there would be something better out there. Especially for pistols, most snub nosed pistols provide very low velocities due to the short barrel.

                    I was thinking we should be shooting stainless steel bullets with fracture points for HD rounds.

                    Problem is that our barrel steel is too weak for that.

                    But imagine how cool it would be to have a snub nosed 38 obtain 2000Fps!

                    Guns would be a lot safer too.

                    Just thinking out loud. Anyone see any problems with this? Besides over penetration [emoji14]

                    BTW, I know the costs and tooling would be expensive. But having a powerful pocket carry 25 acp would be pretty cool!
                    Last edited by SVT-40; 06-30-2016, 5:57 PM.
                    Poke'm with a stick!


                    Originally posted by fiddletown
                    What you believe and what is true in real life in the real world aren't necessarily the same thing. And what you believe doesn't change what is true in real life in the real world.

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      ziconceo
                      Veteran Member
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 3269

                      Not worried about legalities. Just a random thought. That law is really stupid because a ton of Nazi 9mm was iron cored.
                      I don't drink or Smoke. I spend my money on gunpowder and gasoline.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        SVT-40
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Jan 2008
                        • 12894

                        Originally posted by ziconceo
                        Not worried about legalities. Just a random thought. That law is really stupid because a ton of Nazi 9mm was iron cored.
                        Those rounds had a sintered iron core and were not solid steel. Not true solid core machined projectiles.
                        Poke'm with a stick!


                        Originally posted by fiddletown
                        What you believe and what is true in real life in the real world aren't necessarily the same thing. And what you believe doesn't change what is true in real life in the real world.

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          SVT-40
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Jan 2008
                          • 12894

                          Make some titanium projectiles. Why go low tech with stainless steel?
                          Poke'm with a stick!


                          Originally posted by fiddletown
                          What you believe and what is true in real life in the real world aren't necessarily the same thing. And what you believe doesn't change what is true in real life in the real world.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            Dezrat
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2013
                            • 667

                            Lehigh has been selling these for quite some time now,

                            Underwood sells them in their own line also. Wonder how they've had no problem as the statute seems to imply they would.
                            Last edited by Dezrat; 07-01-2016, 7:58 AM.

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              ziconceo
                              Veteran Member
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 3269

                              Originally posted by SVT-40
                              Make some titanium projectiles. Why go low tech with stainless steel?
                              Haha too light. Though, titanium is brittle right? What about a titanium case (easy fragmenting) with a tungsten core (weight)
                              I don't drink or Smoke. I spend my money on gunpowder and gasoline.

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                joepamjohn
                                Veteran Member
                                • Apr 2009
                                • 2709

                                Originally posted by taktiks
                                Cost more than anything. Retooling for different metals is enough that most major manufacturers won't bother.

                                Also, the harder the metal, the more brittle it is, so lifespan and durability would come into play.
                                They really should consider alternative metals so when the confiscated guns get melted down they can have more uses than just manhole covers.
                                "You can't handle the truth"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1