Another thread made me think of this: If California doesn't want you to own large capacity magazines, does it make sense to use 10/30 mags in public? Discuss.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/30 Round Magazines. Is that a Good idea?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
I have some don't use them, they only hold 10 rounds and get it the way if you are shooting prone or at a bench.
I have never had anyone ask me to look and make sure they were blocked if that is what you are asking.
I think the 10 round limit is dumb but I also follow it to the "T" on something that could make you a felon. (over 10 rounds + fixed mag = felon)
I do have 17 round mags for my PT99 but don't use them a lot ether. -
I don't care. I'm legal and I know it, if someone wants to call the police and have them check that's fine. After the police check they'll leave me alone and I'll keep enjoying my time....as a trade for a glock 43. wtf guys, wtf.Originally posted by m---------------1Bump... also interested in 1911 for tradeComment
-
No. It's too dangerous.
That's why I only use drums......
$500 Donation to any Veterans Charity - Plus $500 Gift Card to any gun store: Visit 2nd Amendment Mortgage / www.2AMortgage.comComment
-
10 round magazines are legal in any configuration, as long as it only holds 10 rounds, regardless of its appearance. If you don't feel comfortable using them, don't. I've never had anyone say anything to me about my magazines.Comment
-
Either it holds 10 rounds or not. Attacking this issue based on "looks" is ridiculous.
I have a hot-rod yellow custom car holding a 540HP LT1 engine under the hood, and C.A.R.B. legal. It will do a 12.5 second quarter mile and top-speed of about 160MPH. If I'm driving 60MPH within a 65MPH zone on a nice clear day, in public - SO?
Should I resign myself to only driving a bland, gray, Toyota Prius 60MPH within a 65MPH zone on a nice clear day just to be SURE I'm going the speed limit? There is no sense in that.
The "sense" is either it's legal or it's not. Aesthetics and appearances need not apply.-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
Only out of state.sigpic
PIMP stands for Positive Intellectual Motivated Person
When pimping begins, friendship ends.
Don't let your history be a mysteryComment
-
They're legal, so I use them freely. No one has ever checked them, questioned them, or suggested their disuse. No paranoia here.Join Active Junky for online rebates....$10 to both you and me!
https://www.activejunky.com/invite/238017
Comment
-
Under current CA laws...
As long as they are permanently modified to accept 10 rounds, they are 100% legal to own/use/transfer.
Because they are 100% CA legal, the CA legislature is currently trying to ban them* via SB1446.
*Them being magazines that have been permanently modified to accept 10 rounds but appear to hold more than 10 rounds.
Current thread about SB1446.sigpic
"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,217
Posts: 25,133,682
Members: 358,387
Active Members: 5,883
Welcome to our newest member, LakeLife.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 13221 users online. 57 members and 13164 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment