Interfamilial Transfer Rule Change

[<blocked>]

Just got a call from my FFL that the CADOJ contacted him as to a rule change regarding transfers (yet to be released) to include the 1 in 30 rule.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CGT80]

It wouldn't surprise me, but it is a bunch of BS as usual. Sometimes families need to transfer an entire collection at one time or end up screwed by using other means, and that could put a stop to that.

How much effect would it have on preventing shootings?

ZERO

[P5Ret]

If your talking interstate, then I believe 1 in 30 already applies to those. OPLAW would not involve a FFL dealer so I'm not sure how they could change that to be included in the 1 in 30.

[djflash]

Any time a firearm is transferred from an FFL to you (except gunsmithing) the 1 in 30 rule applies. There are very few exceptions to this. As stated by P5Ret if it's via OPLAW (Interfamilial within the state) then 1 in 30 does NOT apply and no FFL is required so long as you submit the state paperwork and $19.

To clarify, used guns sold to an FFL are bound by the 1 in 30 rule and PPT's are exempt from 1 in 30 (except in LA).

[Librarian]

Not really news - intrafamilial between CA residents does not use an FFL, so the 'make application' - submit DROS - language does not apply.

But interstate is forced through the CA FFL, and intrafamilial is not listed among the exemptions to 1 in 30.