2nd Amendment Repeal - Need Your Vote - Poll

[USMCM16A2]

Body bags by the truck load.

Folks,



The Authorities better have lots of body bags. Law enforcement better think twice, the politicians are just going to keep pushing. The gays, transgender folks can keep shoving their agenda down our throats, the illegals can keep gaining rights that were not afforded before. And we lose ground, A2

[vliberatore]

Funny. The very act of posting this is, by definition, not myob.

Sent from my SM-T230NU using Tapatalk

Yep, because that matters in hypothetical scenarios

[fritztkatt]

Let me put it to you this way, gentlemen... if someone tries to take my guns, they will have to pry them from my cold dead hands, and hopefully they bust their *** slipping on the pile of hot brass.

Anyone whom tries to confiscate my neighbors posessions, will have to go through me. I, for one, will not stand for any gross violation of rights. Never will I allow any private or government entity to search my property without a valid warrant.

If my CO ordered me to confiscate weapons from American citizens, I would likely do more than just go UA. Although I doubt any significant amount if servicemen would obey the same order.

[aklon]

There are more of us than there are of them, so why should we be the ones to submit?

Besides: we're armed; they're not. They have to send their minions to do the dirty work, otherwise all they can do is throw tofu cakes at us.

[Mayor McRifle]

Never underestimate the power of a group that truly believes in its cause.

[LowThudd]

Never underestimate the power of a group that truly believes in its cause.

That kinda works both ways, but I see your point.

[MrPlink]

Lemme find my tinfoil hat and I will promptly get to answering these questions.

I think I left it in my fallout shelter next to my anti-ufo battery but I'm not sure

[Kyle1886]

{snip]

There are more of us than there are of them, so why should we be the ones to submit?

There may be more of "us" than "them" but I suspect that the "us" will fall into three or more groups when/if it comes to Go Time.

Us older generations will likely try to buck the system and give it the best shot.

The middle group with young kids, wife and good job will likely sit it out or see which way the wind blows. Possibly as a passive support entity, but not visibly active.

The younger group, in general, have already been somewhat "conditioned against" or apathetic to rebellious causes that are not social based.

Of course there will always be the a significant number that will align with the winning side at that moment.

Yes, there will be exceptions in each group, so I'm speaking in general.

Just an opinion...

Respectfully
Kyle

[Bigedski]

OVER MY DEAD BODY

[Lone_Gunman]

I would never surrender my weapons. I've read enough history to know what happens after they disarm you.

[Lone_Gunman]

You can all fight back, but I guarantee you all that do, you wont survive. Be willing to accept death if you want to fight for your rights.

Some might, some might not. Would you rather live as a slave, or die as a man?

Edit: and then you have to think logistically. That will never be able to take the guns, they don't have the manpower, and only a percentage would ever be turned in. That's why they're trying to change the culture and kill the acceptance and normalization of gun ownership by a thousand cuts. The best thing you can do to protect gun ownership is raise children to understand and accept guns or take a non-shooter to the range.

[readysetgo]

Down for whatever. Prefer peace.

Ultima Ratio

[phantomx48]

In this situation, who would come for our guns? Local law enforcement? The military? Those are two groups who also swore an oath to our constitution, and I do not see them obeying such orders. . .at least not all of them. Not sure if it would be a 20/80 split, or 50/50, but I do know that a large majority of those men & women would not obey orders that would go against the constitution, especially having to face their friends, neighbors, and relatives.

So yeah, they might be able to pass a law, but I don't see a day where that law would be enforced by our military and/or police.

Of course if I am wrong. . .then the country has already gone to hell, and the question to me becomes meaningless. At that point there is no other option but to fight. History has shown us time and time again what happens to people when their government disarms them, and turns on them.

[Mayor McRifle]

That kinda works both ways, but I see your point.

Do you really think the Antis are as genuinely committed to their cause as we are to ours? I'm not talking about lobbying efforts. I'm talking about how far they are really willing to go, what they are willing to sacrifice, and what they are willing to risk in order to strip us of rights and liberties that many (I hope most) of us are willing to stand up and fight for. And those that they would have attempt to force our compliance on their behalf, would they be equally committed?

[LowThudd]

Do you really think the Antis are as genuinely committed to their cause as we are to ours? I'm not talking about lobbying efforts. I'm talking about how far they are really willing to go, what they are willing to sacrifice, and what they are willing to risk in order to strip us of rights and liberties that many (I hope most) of us are willing to stand up and fight for. And those that they would have attempt to force our compliance on their behalf, would they be equally committed?

No, the antis won't risk them selves. They expect others to do that. But, I could see a "peaceful" bullying occurring. They are already setting up the works for that. Just need to brainwash a few million more.