Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Insider Assessment of Fauci

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nihonto Chicken
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 448

    Insider Assessment of Fauci

    Linked below a recent ZH article by a NIH insider regarding Fauci and the good ol' boy (and girl) public health mafia that controlled medical opinion in the COVID daze, FWIW.



    "Fauci is highly territorial and has never allowed anyone—even the President of the United States—to mess with his fiefdom."
    "Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~ C. S. Lewis
  • #2
    Spanky8601
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 2206

    Glad he is no longer in charge. He is evil.
    May I always be the type of person my dog thinks I am

    Comment

    • #3
      sigfan91
      Calguns Addict
      • Jun 2009
      • 8741

      Fauci would make Mengele proud.

      Comment

      • #4
        Big Chudungus
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2021
        • 2036

        related......https://www.statnews.com/2025/05/05/...rsity-faculty/

        ain't there supposed to be some law that says if you are a top weapons guy for USA you can't just go to work for some "adversary" nation's weapons program?

        of course I guess he could come back with "USA was funding bio-weapons in China for years, probably still is".

        I heard the total amount of Tax Dollars that went through Fauci's hands over the years was insane, $90 billion or $900 billion or something. He was practically a one man cabinet level Dept.

        Even he seems now lame, if not compromised, its nice that RFKjr who wrote "The Real Fauci" book was put in charge. I hear its a great book, Research Lawyer wise, but really needs a good Cliff Notes version for the rest of us. Maybe that is legally tricky to do and still be Law Suit Proof?
        Last edited by Big Chudungus; 05-06-2025, 7:18 PM.

        Comment

        • #5
          TrappedinCalifornia
          Calguns Addict
          • Jan 2018
          • 8234

          In my mind, this is the crucial part (from the article)...

          ...But NIH’s errors are not merely a matter of oversight failure—they are the result of scientific arrogance compounded by an ingrained, symbiotic relationship between federal science officers and the research academics they fund. This relationship is mutually beneficial as scientists depend on NIH funding to build their careers, while NIH officers rely on these same scientists to generate the groundbreaking studies that justify new initiatives and expand NIH’s influence.

          Academic scientists and NIH bureaucrats don’t just collaborate professionally—they often emerge from the same university laboratories, attend the same conferences, and publish together in the same journals. Instead of government oversight of academic research, we have a system that rewards allegiance and mutual advancement. This cozy relationship is cemented by lavish taxpayer-funded travel to international conferences, where federal officers and the university scientists they support fly around the world, stay together at luxury hotels, and forge alliances that prioritize career advancement over public safety...
          It goes back to... If everyone is thinking alike, then no one is thinking.

          It also goes back to... If you ask questions, you're part of the problem. As I expressed on a number of threads, all Science begins with a question and the questions never truly stop or shouldn't. Everything is relevant or potentially so until it's demonstrated not to be; i.e., don't just let someone tell you, make them show you. A dirty little secret is that by making them show you, their assumptions and premises show, meaning that relevant questions can be asked.

          Comment

          • #6
            sigfan91
            Calguns Addict
            • Jun 2009
            • 8741

            Originally posted by TrappedinCalifornia
            In my mind, this is the crucial part (from the article)...



            It goes back to... If everyone is thinking alike, then no one is thinking.

            It also goes back to... If you ask questions, you're part of the problem. As I expressed on a number of threads, all Science begins with a question and the questions never truly stop or shouldn't. Everything is relevant or potentially so until it's demonstrated not to be; i.e., don't just let someone tell you, make them show you. A dirty little secret is that by making them show you, their assumptions and premises show, meaning that relevant questions can be asked.
            But…but….but….settled science….

            Comment

            • #7
              ProfChaos
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2021
              • 1009

              Originally posted by sigfan91
              Fauci would make Mengele proud.
              Are we sure he isnt his grandson or something?
              "The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia." -George Orwell 1984

              1984 was supposed to be a warning, not a "How To" guide.

              Time magazine bragging about how they stole the election: https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1