The next pandemic

[subscriber]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qk9Nd4uhJQg

[subscriber]

Now Gates is crapping on his own vax tech:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPTgCwvfAfY

[TrappedinCalifornia]

Now Gates is crapping on his own vax tech:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPTgCwvfAfY

He's not so much dumping on his own tech as he is openly acknowledging what we've mostly complained about from the beginning. Just like his 3 things...

1. Not infection blocking - meaning you can still be infected, just, perhaps, not as severely.
2. They are variant specific rather than broad based against the 'family' of viruses.
3. Whatever resistance (which is different than 'immunity') they impart is short-lived.

It's the very reason they, literally, changed the definition in that these so-called 'vaccines' do not meet the standards of the old definition. There's a reason I reference them as... so-called 'vaccines.'

As I've posted several times, what they have been after is an 'universal vaccine' or, perhaps, more accurately, a delivery method which will allow for an 'universal vaccine.' I've posted some of the references in the past and if you listen to Gates in the clip, he's still 'selling' the idea; i.e., these 3 things are 'easily fixed.' Uh huh. Then why haven't you fixed them? Why was this not able to meet the criteria to be authorized before the 'pandemic?' Why doesn't an 'universal vaccine' actually exist?

The reality is that they are still seeking the technology and, something I've posited before, they thought they had it with mRNA technology. As a result, this was a grand experiment on a worldwide scale. The actual money the whole thing made was a secondary benefit.

The money was 'good' for individual investors. The money was 'good' for corporations in that it funded continuing research. The money was 'bad' for everyone else in that the tech hasn't 'proved' itself and any 'casualties' were just part of the 'cost' of what they believe to be 'progress.'