Fauci's Former NIH Boss, Chief Francis Collins, Admits COVID Lockdown Was ?Another Mi

[bigbossman]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/watch-fauci-s-former-nih-boss-chief-francis-collins-admits-covid-lockdown-was-another-mistake-we-made/ar-AA1mhPzz?rc=1&ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=c6e8b3047f804116f82fd2cf6cee62ca&ei=48

[?So you attach infinite value to stopping the disease and saving a life. You attach zero value to whether this actually totally disrupts people?s lives, ruins the economy, and has many kids kept out of school in a way that they never quite recover from. So, yeah, collateral damage...

AND

The Journal noted that the “lockdowns did tremendous harm that we are still living with. That and the effort by Drs. Collins and Fauci to shut off all debate is a major reason the public has lost trust in public-health experts.”

AND

“Not too long ago, anyone who said that epidemiologists might be overly focused on disease prevention to the exclusion of other concerns — you know, like jobs, mental health, and schooling — were dismissed as reckless nihilists who didn’t care if their fellow citizens died en masse...”

You don't say...... These people are effing criminals.

[wpage]

Just another Mistake...

Amoung many others like the border, energy, and you name it.

A total losers administrations run by fools.

[XDJYo]

Bastards.

"Watch: Fauci's Former NIH Boss, Chief Francis Collins, Admits COVID Lockdown Was ‘Another Mistake We Made'
Former National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins has admitted that tunnel vision handicapped the development of public policy to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Collins, who stepped down at the end of 2021, was the superior of former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci, who along with Collins proposed and supported lockdowns as the major policy element to deal with the pandemic.

During the recently unearthed interview, interviewer Wilk Wilkinson bemoaned the fact that too few open discussions took place about the pandemic and the lockdown policy.

Collins said putting public health bureaucrats in charge meant that a one-dimensional policy would ensue.
“As a guy living inside the Beltway, feeling a sense of crisis, trying to decide what to do in some situation room in the White House with people who had data that was incomplete,” Collins said.

https://youtu.be/W1eAvh1sWiw?si=_QtbT6Y_TPWOXpmF&t=3245

“We weren’t really thinking about what that would mean to Wilk and his family in Minnesota, a thousand miles away from where the virus was hitting so hard. We weren’t really considering the consequences in communities that were not New York City or some other big city,” he said.

Collins said that health experts never considered the ripple effects of their decisions.

“The public health people — we talked about this earlier and this really important point — if you’re a public health person and you’re trying to make a decision, you have this very narrow view of what the right decision is. And that is something that will save a life; it doesn’t matter what else happens,” he said.

“So you attach infinite value to stopping the disease and saving a life. You attach zero value to whether this actually totally disrupts people’s lives, ruins the economy, and has many kids kept out of school in a way that they never quite recover from. So, yeah, collateral damage,” he said.

“This is a public health mindset and I think a lot of us involved in trying to make those recommendations had that mindset and that was really unfortunate. It’s another mistake we made,” he said.

It's hard to overstate how irresponsible and destructive Francis Collins' view is and was. He dispensed with all the rest of public health to focus on covid and lockdown, and countless millions -- especially children and the poor -- paid the price, sometimes with their lives. https://t.co/J8dv5ro3xV

— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) December 31, 2023

The Wall Street Journal responded with an editorial that noted, "This was precisely the argument we made on March 20, 2020 ('Rethinking the Virus Shutdown'), for politicians not to accept the lockdown advice of public-health officials as gospel. They think too narrowly, and political leaders have to consider the larger consequences of policies for the public good.”

“Dr. Collins’s mini-mea culpa still doesn’t make up for his collaboration with Anthony Fauci to discredit the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated a strategy of focused protection on the elderly and vulnerable while letting younger people at lower risk continue with their lives. Nor does the former NIH head apologize for trying to censor different health-policy advice,” the editorial, which also noted that this interview was part of a summer symposium hosted by a bipartisan group, stated.

The Journal noted that the “lockdowns did tremendous harm that we are still living with. That and the effort by Drs. Collins and Fauci to shut off all debate is a major reason the public has lost trust in public-health experts.”

In an Op-Ed on National Review, Rich Lowry wrote that what Collins said earlier last year would have triggered punishments during the pandemic.

“Not too long ago, anyone who said that epidemiologists might be overly focused on disease prevention to the exclusion of other concerns — you know, like jobs, mental health, and schooling — were dismissed as reckless nihilists who didn’t care if their fellow citizens died en masse,” he wrote.

“If Francis Collins and his cohort got it wrong, the likes of Florida governor Ron DeSantis and Georgia governor Brian Kemp — and the renegade scientists and doctors who supported their more modulated approach to the pandemic — got it right,” he wrote."

[oddball]

Francis Collins:

[Epaphroditus]

The most true think he ever said "we weren't really thinking"

Except they were as it was all part of the plan.

[Big Chudungus]

Francis Collins:

Francis is lying. OF COURSE its a real big deal in Medical stuff that "well, if we do this and it changes behavior and causes other risks, like making trip to doctor, what is the overall stats on the harm/benefit."

This is VERY well known for stuff like bringing new tech to some 3rd World region. Are you going to have people at risk and getting other problems because they make some long hard trip to bring their kid to the American's machine with the blinking lights? Hint: It can be really hard to get true net gain, and harder the more info and data you include.

Its even been a known thing for decades that "smoking cigs is bad, but a big WEIGHT gain if you stop smoking is likely worse, and not just for heart/lungs but stuff like knees and feet arches, and EMPLOYMENT"

[Big Chudungus]

The most true think he ever said "we weren't really thinking"

Except they were as it was all part of the plan.

He is trying to play it off like he was a 7yr old kid riding his bike down a steep hill on a dare, or a shoplifting teeny-bopper.

[M76]

NIH = Narcissistic Ingrateful Hacks

[sd_shooter]

[Epaphroditus]

Cost/benefit is a foundation of many endeavors. To claim otherwise is a dead giveaway of crime in progress.

Even criminals engage in cost/benefit assessments.

What were his costs versus benefits? Partial societal collapse is just a cost that was offset by the benefit of massive power and cash grab. Not much to do with public health.

[joepamjohn]

Just another Mistake...

Amoung many others like the border, energy, and you name it.

A total losers administrations run by fools.

Sadly all soon to be re-elected too?..