Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Women said covid shots affect periods. A new study shows they’re right

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sigfan91
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Jun 2009
    • 10310

    Women said covid shots affect periods. A new study shows they’re right

    Not long after the rollout of coronavirus vaccines last year, women around the country began posting on social media about what they believed was a strange side effect: changes to their periods.

    Now, new research shows that many of the complaints were valid. A study of nearly 20,000 people around the world shows that getting vaccinated against covid can change the timing of the menstrual cycle. Vaccinated people experienced, on average, about a one-day delay in getting their periods, compared with those who hadn’t been vaccinated.


    This is from Washington Post, the anti-Trump, far left, swamp-backed newspaper owned by Trump-hater Jeff Bezos.

    Someone should post this on Facebook to see if it gets censored.

    Or some doctor in California should advise her patients about this and see if she would be in trouble for violating California's "wuhan virus truth law."

    The article doesn't mention any "adverse" effects of this. However, one must ask, if what we have long suspected about the vaccine affecting a woman's period to be correct, then what else could it do? Do women want to risk possibly altering their biology for something as minor as a common cold?
    Last edited by sigfan91; 09-27-2022, 6:33 PM.
  • #2
    ProfChaos
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2021
    • 1111

    Everything that was censored or got you banned is being slowly trickled out and hoped it would be kept under the rug.
    "The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia." -George Orwell 1984

    1984 was supposed to be a warning, not a "How To" guide.

    Time magazine bragging about how they stole the election: https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

    Comment

    • #3
      GimpsUnlimited
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2013
      • 1653

      See, this is where you anti-vaxxers are wrong. The severe the side effects indicates the jabs/boosters are working extra hard to make you gooder. As a matter of fact, the more severe, the better. And if you happen to die suddenly for no apparent reason, that just means WuHan flu will never be able to invade your body. Who says jabs don't work!!!
      Lifetime NRA member.
      --------------------------
      Molon labe

      Comment

      • #4
        Epaphroditus
        Veteran Member
        • Sep 2013
        • 4888

        Tricky part here is the mechanism by which menstrual cycle is disrupted- wanna bet fertility is negatively impacted ... and worse?
        CA firearms laws timeline BLM land maps

        Comment

        • #5
          bruss01
          Calguns Addict
          • Feb 2006
          • 5336

          Author Naomi Wolf recently did a deep dive on this subject (menstrual dysregulation) and with miscarriages occurring in pregnant women who got vaccinated.

          She found that the profound loss these women experienced when the miscarriage happened was classified in the study results by Pfizer in the same category as someone who gets a rash for a few days that clears up, because from their clinical view the "patient" was fine (physically) in a few days... after she recovered from losing the baby.

          So these statistics were used to buttress Pfizer's "safe and effective" claims when a blind man would see them showing the exact opposite.
          The one thing worse than defeat is surrender.

          Comment

          • #6
            johncage
            Banned
            • Dec 2018
            • 993

            Originally posted by bruss01
            Author Naomi Wolf recently did a deep dive on this subject (menstrual dysregulation) and with miscarriages occurring in pregnant women who got vaccinated.

            She found that the profound loss these women experienced when the miscarriage happened was classified in the study results by Pfizer in the same category as someone who gets a rash for a few days that clears up, because from their clinical view the "patient" was fine (physically) in a few days... after she recovered from losing the baby.

            So these statistics were used to buttress Pfizer's "safe and effective" claims when a blind man would see them showing the exact opposite.
            good example of how the people who lie and manipulate data regarding covid are not just being well meaning but wrong, but are intentionally malicious knowing full well they will cause death and suffering.

            Comment

            • #7
              DaveInOroValley
              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
              CGN Contributor
              • Jan 2010
              • 8967

              One of our family members that is and had been against the clot shot gave in because she had to travel to Hawaii to help her Sister. She's 63. After just getting one shot her regular cycle started up again. She isn't amused.
              NRA Life Member

              Vet since 1978

              "Don't bother me with facts, Son. I've already made up my mind." -Foghorn Leghorn

              Comment

              • #8
                sd_shooter
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Dec 2008
                • 13549

                OP I can tell you're an Ultra-MAGA right winger. There's no such thing as 'Women' here in 2022. It's "Individuals capable of getting pregnant."

                Sheesh!






                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1