Why Were Recent COVID-19 Boosters Authorized Before Human Trials Completed

[TrappedinCalifornia]

PolitiFact: Why were recent COVID-19 boosters authorized before human trials completed?

I think this clip probably conveys the thought...

[OlderThanDirt]

The oligarchy feels that any booster that is good enough for six mice is good enough for the lowly masses. If you kill or maim a few thousand serfs, there are plenty of replacements available dying for a chance to replace an American.

[Dan_Eastvale]

Because they wanted to deceive the public early on that it was a horror movie kind of plague

[Beelzy]

The oligarchy feels that any booster that is good enough for six mice is good enough for the lowly masses. If you kill or maim a few thousand serfs, there are plenty of replacements available dying for a chance to replace an American.

Whoa, let's make sure the numbers are right here. It was far more mice than that....it was a whopping 8.
But no worries, the sheep study is fully underway.

[Marauder2003]

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$

[OlderThanDirt]

Whoa, let's make sure the numbers are right here. It was far more mice than that....it was a whopping 8.
But no worries, the sheep study is fully underway.

[Epaphroditus]

The dead mice died before 14 days after the shot so technically they were not vaccinated. Plus they had multiple comorbidities and were very old.







Yes, sardonic humor.

[sigfan91]

The dead mice died before 14 days after the shot so technically they were not vaccinated. Plus they had multiple comorbidities and were very old.







Yes, sardonic humor.

Maybe they should have tested the new vaccine on humans before giving it to the lab mice.








I’m serious.

[Fastattack]

We don't need no stinkin' trials!

[stonefly-2]

Well, that's the 64-dollar question isn't it?

I tend to assume that the result of a given action was the intended result
of that action most of the time.

If there is so great a need to wipe out the immune system of the human
population and purposely inflict disease, there is something we aren't being
told.

The shortage of people pointing and crying "evil" and the success in suppressing those that do leads me to wonder if there might not be some altruistic reason for these things that have been done.

Finding abstract scenarios that fill that bill is one thing,

finding ones you would type on to the internet is another.

[stix213]

Best way to claim there are no side effects, is to not look for any.

[ibanezfoo]

It takes a long time to kill millions of people. They needed to start as quickly as they could.

[Oneaudiopro]

Fact: There isn’t now, nor has there ever been, an FDA “approved” vaccine. The only vaccines available were emergency approved. And in addition to that, a true vaccine would prevent you from actually contracting the disease as well as transmitting it to others. We all know now that is far from the truth. Whenever the government gets involved with ANYTHING, is the time to take a step back and ask yourself why? That’s all

[Palmaris]

Because they can save more money to pockets without trial.

[garand1945]

Well they are giving it under an emergency use authorization when any sane person sees there is no current emergency. So you expect how it was tested to make sense?