Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

It's official: Covid pill 'Paxlovid' doesn't work

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sd_shooter
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Dec 2008
    • 13544

    It's official: Covid pill 'Paxlovid' doesn't work

    The faux 'vaccines' didn't work and neither does The Pill



    The business asserted that it will nonetheless incorporate the new information in its impending application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to request complete authorization for the administration of Paxlovid to high-risk COVID-19 individuals.
  • #2
    Scota4570
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2006
    • 1719

    $100 billion in sales make it a very successful drug. Who care if it works?

    Pfizer reckons it will make a whopping $22 billion in sales of its oral COVID-19 antiviral Paxlovid in 2022, with another $32 billion from its BioNTech-partnered coronavirus vaccine Comirnaty. The massive windfall revenues will drive its sales up towards the $100 billion mark – it's estimating a range of $98 to $102 billion – up from $81.3 billion in 2021, which was almost twice revenues in the prior year.


    It is right out of a sci-fi movie, time index 1:30 :

    Last edited by Scota4570; 06-17-2022, 12:42 PM.

    Comment

    • #3
      sbo80
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2014
      • 2264

      if you read the article, it seems a statistical thing. People who are "low risk", by definition already have hardly any hospitalization or deaths. You can't reduce deaths, if deaths are already at zero (which they were in this study, both the placebo group, and the drug group). Eventually, one person in a larger placebo group did die. A single one. Statistically, that proves nothing, and they are admitting it. It's also showing what many have known all along, that for the majority of low-risk people, there's no need for any special "treatment" at all, it's just not that bad.

      Comment

      • #4
        Libertarian777
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2010
        • 576

        Originally posted by sbo80
        if you read the article, it seems a statistical thing. People who are "low risk", by definition already have hardly any hospitalization or deaths. You can't reduce deaths, if deaths are already at zero (which they were in this study, both the placebo group, and the drug group). Eventually, one person in a larger placebo group did die. A single one. Statistically, that proves nothing, and they are admitting it. It's also showing what many have known all along, that for the majority of low-risk people, there's no need for any special "treatment" at all, it's just not that bad.
        If only they did the same study for the vaccines. ASR kept trying to tell us it was in phase 3 etc. Yet never addressed the fact that the control arm was vaccinated 3 months after the study started, making it impossible to complete the double blind RCT.

        Comment

        • #5
          Epaphroditus
          Veteran Member
          • Sep 2013
          • 4888

          So covid is not dangerous enough to provide sufficient fodder to demonstrate statistical significance of efficacy of treatment. Hmmm.
          CA firearms laws timeline BLM land maps

          Comment

          • #6
            sd_shooter
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Dec 2008
            • 13544

            Originally posted by Epaphroditus
            So covid is not dangerous enough to provide sufficient fodder to demonstrate statistical significance of efficacy of treatment. Hmmm.
            A few Tylenos and a box of Kleenex is enough for 99% of people. (Elderly, Obese and those with pre-existing conditions: You already have one foot in the grave, nothing will save you)

            Comment

            • #7
              stix213
              AKA: Joe Censored
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Apr 2009
              • 18998

              The goal for these rushed therapeutics and the pseudo vax was to generate high revenues. They have worked very well at what they were designed to do, which has little to do with any virus.

              Comment

              • #8
                sd_shooter
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Dec 2008
                • 13544

                Originally posted by stix213
                The goal for these rushed therapeutics and the pseudo vax was to generate high revenues. They have worked very well at what they were designed to do, which has little to do with any virus.
                Also a great way to tag all the subservient followers. Those who do not comply are marginalized.

                Comment

                • #9
                  stonefly-2
                  Veteran Member
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 4993

                  Originally posted by sd_shooter
                  Also a great way to tag all the subservient followers. Those who do not comply are marginalized.

                  But at least we will be alive.
                  What do you call the people that abandoned the agenda of John Kennedy and adopted the agenda of Lee Oswald?

                  Pronouns: "Dude" and "Playa".

                  https://billstclair.com/Unintended-Consequences.pdf


                  I was born under a wandrin star.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Barbastard
                    Member
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 129

                    Wife had Covid last week (she's unvaccinated and this is 2nd time she's had it). Doctor sent her home with "Paxlovid" and told her to take it. Her symptoms were fairly mild (low grade fever, head cold, stuffy, achy...normal cold stuff) and far less than last time she had it in January.

                    She took one dose of it....and then swore never again to take it again. Side effects were terrible for her. Massively upset stomach (to the point of not being able to keep anything down) and horrible taste in her mouth. The side effects were way worse than Covid. Apparently they're pretty common (https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/13...lovid-covid-19).

                    Bottom line...would not recommend it and sounds like it's efficacy is marginal...at best.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Libertarian777
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 576

                      Originally posted by Barbastard
                      Wife had Covid last week (she's unvaccinated and this is 2nd time she's had it). Doctor sent her home with "Paxlovid" and told her to take it. Her symptoms were fairly mild (low grade fever, head cold, stuffy, achy...normal cold stuff) and far less than last time she had it in January.

                      She took one dose of it....and then swore never again to take it again. Side effects were terrible for her. Massively upset stomach (to the point of not being able to keep anything down) and horrible taste in her mouth. The side effects were way worse than Covid. Apparently they're pretty common (https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/13...lovid-covid-19).

                      Bottom line...would not recommend it and sounds like it's efficacy is marginal...at best.
                      Actually it's worse than that. Paxlovid makes your u more susceptible to covid.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1