Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

First Pfizer data drop.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    DolphinFan
    Veteran Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 2586

    10/15/2022 - Called to get on the list
    2/18/2023 - Interview set
    4/27/2023 - Class
    4/30/2023 - Live Scan
    5/9/2023 - Interview
    6/26/2023 - Approval Letter
    8/1/2023 - Issued

    Comment

    • #17
      ibanezfoo
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Apr 2007
      • 12566

      Whats that saying about divorce by .38 is easier than divorce by lawyer or something like that? Divorce by covid vax even easier...
      vindicta inducit ad salutem?

      Comment

      • #18
        Deadon
        Calguns Addict
        • Aug 2010
        • 9975

        Can't believe there's not more people tripping on this info.
        Lions not sheep.

        Comment

        • #19
          the_tunaman
          Veteran Member
          • Dec 2012
          • 2569

          A whole lot of info to try to absorb, no mainstream coverage, and this is the only thread I’ve seen anywhere on the subject. All by design.
          MAGA - drain the swamp^D^D^D^D^Dcesspool!
          Proud deplorable wacist!
          #NotMyStateGovernment!
          Just remember BAMN - there is no level too low for them to stoop!
          COVID survivor - ain?t gonna get pricked!

          Comment

          • #20
            GlockN'Roll
            Veteran Member
            • May 2015
            • 3805

            Originally posted by bigbossman

            Rocket Man, Balgor, Duenor, and Big Mike were wrong.

            Very, very wrong.

            And now they look stupid.

            Very, very stupid.
            They always looked stupid,

            now they are merely revealed to be the completely dishonest shills for the FDA, CDC, Pfizer. etc.,

            that we all suspected that were....
            Real Californian...

            Comment

            • #21
              JoshlikesARs
              Member
              • Jun 2009
              • 332

              More proof that calguns is mostly gas lighting boomers with their head in the sand. Good to see a lot of poeple in this thread are still paying attention...

              Congrats fellow critical thinkers. Remember, you will know if a politician is lying if their lips are moving.

              Everything is UKRAINE UKRAINE UKRAINE now. Do not need people talking about hte COVID jab debacle anymore...we cant let them get away with this!

              Comment

              • #22
                spectralhunter
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2015
                • 618

                Comment

                • #23
                  five.five-six
                  CGN Contributor
                  • May 2006
                  • 34946


                  Funny how Putin invaded Ukraine just in time to eclipse this dump.

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Deadon
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Aug 2010
                    • 9975

                    I'm not going to answer your questions because I'm guessing you haven't followed along on how all this was done. This data isn't all that showed these vaccines were suspect. CDC hid information, they all lied, FDA said it would take 55 years to produce this information when it took them 108 days to approve it. Two FDA vaccine heads quit. We also saw the other Pfizer drop two and a half months in and it showed deaths and side effects. Malone holds the mRNA patent and he's warned against these vaccines. They got rid of the control group. The list goes on and on. We have 6 more data dumps to come.

                    Maybe someone else will answer your question.
                    Lions not sheep.

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      spectralhunter
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2015
                      • 618

                      Originally posted by Deadon
                      I'm not going to answer your questions because I'm guessing you haven't followed along on how all this was done. This data isn't all that showed these vaccines were suspect. CDC hid information, they all lied, FDA said it would take 55 years to produce this information when it took them 108 days to approve it. Two FDA vaccine heads quit. We also saw the other Pfizer drop two and a half months in and it showed deaths and side effects. Malone holds the mRNA patent and he's warned against these vaccines. They got rid of the control group. The list goes on and on. We have 6 more data dumps to come.

                      Maybe someone else will answer your question.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        balgor
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2011
                        • 1553

                        You guys should seriously try reading the actual report clearly, none of you have:



                        Page 16 & Table 7 should be of interest (or not):

                        3.1.3. Review of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

                        Please refer to Appendix 1 for the list of the company’s AESIs for BNT162b2.

                        The company’s AESI list takes into consideration the lists of AESIs from the following expert groups and regulatory authorities: Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS protocol, US CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance), MHRA (unpublished guideline).

                        The AESI terms are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their association with severe COVID-19 and events of interest for vaccines in general.

                        The AESI list is comprised of MedDRA PTs, HLTs, HLGTs or MedDRA SMQs and can be changed as appropriate based on the evolving safety profile of the vaccine.

                        Table 7 provides a summary review of cumulative cases within AESI categories in the Pfizer safety database. This is distinct from safety signal evaluations which are conducted and included, as appropriate, in the Summary Monthly Safety Reports submitted regularly to the FDA and other Health Authorities.

                        I'll summarize table 7 for you: "Conclusion: This cumulative case review does not raise new safety issues. Surveillance will continue"


                        That big SCARY list in appendix 1 is just of list of things they MIGHT find. They reviewed for those things in Table 7 and GASP didn't actually find any evidence of them.

                        Why did you skip the Discussion and Conclusion on pages 28-29??? HMMMM?? Just a strange oversight????

                        Discussion p28

                        Pfizer performs frequent and rigorous signal detection on BNT162b2 cases. The findings of these signal detection analyses are consistent with the known safety profile of the vaccine. This cumulative analysis to support the Biologics License Application for BNT162b2, is an integrated analysis of post-authorization safety data, from U.S. and foreign experience, focused on Important Identified Risks, Important Potential Risks, and areas of Important Missing Information identified in the Pharmacovigilance Plan, as well as adverse events of special interest and vaccine administration errors (whether or not associated with an adverse event). The data do not reveal any novel safety concerns or risks requiring label changes and support a favorable benefit risk profile of to the BNT162b2 vaccine.

                        Conclusion p29

                        Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit: risk balance for BNT162b2.

                        Pfizer will continue routine pharmacovigilance activities on behalf of BioNTech according to the Pharmacovigilance Agreement in place, in order to assure patient safety and will inform the Agency if an evaluation of the safety data yields significant new information for BNT162b2.


                        Seriously using pro-vaccine documents to make antivaxx arguments is just embarrassing.
                        Critical Thinking Skills:
                        Learn how to examine your sources and check for fake news or misleading facts.
                        https://libguides.royalroads.ca/criticalthinking

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          theLBC
                          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                          CGN Contributor
                          • Oct 2017
                          • 7594

                          Originally posted by spectralhunter
                          I know all that. My question was specifically about the lengthy list of side effects.

                          If other vaccines which are deemed safe have equally long side effects, I don’t want to crucify Pfizer with it since as you put it, there’s plenty of other ammo.

                          I don’t want to be like the left that blows things out of proportion because I’m ignorant of all information.


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
                          virtually every other thing we have had that was called a vaccine was actually a dead or attenuated version of the actual virus, which is too weak to make you seriously ill and cannot replicate, but still causes your body to create antibodies that target the live virus (if you are are exposed to it).

                          on the other hand, the pfizer and moderna "vaccines" are not dead viruses that cause you body to create antibodies, but mRNA that causes your body to create the dangerous spike part of the virus itself.
                          since we now know that the mRNA shots are harmful all by themselves, and can reverse transcribe the genome into our own dna, there is no telling what this might do to people long term.

                          did you know that every mRNA animal trial for other diseases ended in the animals dying, and they skipped that for this experiment?

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            spectralhunter
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2015
                            • 618

                            Originally posted by theLBC
                            virtually every other thing we have had that was called a vaccine was actually a dead or attenuated version of the actual virus, which is too weak to make you seriously ill and cannot replicate, but still causes your body to create antibodies that target the live virus (if you are are exposed to it).

                            on the other hand, the pfizer and moderna "vaccines" are not dead viruses that cause you body to create antibodies, but mRNA that causes your body to create the dangerous spike part of the virus itself.
                            since we now know that the mRNA shots are harmful all by themselves, and can reverse transcribe the genome into our own dna, there is no telling what this might do to people long term.

                            did you know that every mRNA animal trial for other diseases ended in the animals dying, and they skipped that for this experiment?

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              balgor
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2011
                              • 1553

                              Originally posted by spectralhunter
                              Again my question is not being answered. It’s actually a simple question. Do all vaccines generally have a long list of side effects or is the Covid one unique?

                              Just to be clear. I’m not for the Covid vaccine. If people want to take it, go for it. It should be a choice.

                              But there are people screaming there’s so many side effects without even examining or knowing comparable data from other vaccines. I don’t want to be like the irrational left.


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
                              Yes, but AESI are NOT side effects, they are a list of potential adverse effects that investigators look for in trials. MOST AESI are NOT found nor are they expected to be found.



                              See table 1 for list of AESI for the hepB vaccine.
                              Critical Thinking Skills:
                              Learn how to examine your sources and check for fake news or misleading facts.
                              https://libguides.royalroads.ca/criticalthinking

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                five.five-six
                                CGN Contributor
                                • May 2006
                                • 34946

                                Originally posted by balgor
                                Something stupid

                                Yea!!!! BG is alive!


                                We missed you.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1