Pfizer dump.

[Deadon]

And boosters? Welcome to the trials! Lab rats enjoy your stay!

[DGoodale]

What is APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST at the end? It's a list of 1291 medical conditions. Are all of those to have been reported as issues?

[five.five-six]

And boosters? Welcome to the trials! Lab rats enjoy your stay!

a. in 46 cases reported age was <16-year-old and in 34 cases <12-year-old.

[Deadon]

Why the hell is this being allowed to continue? This is going to get ugly in the end. Future generations will ask how this ever happened.

[DGoodale]

Ok, I'm no math wizard, I'm getting almost a 3% fatality rate, is this right?

[anthonyca]

From what I read, heard from Dr's and heard on podcast, these deaths are somewhat vetted, unlike VAERS death reports. This is evil that these EUA shots are being forced on people against the Nuremberg Code and the US Federal Common Rule.

People will burn in hell for this.

[gcvt]

Here, I will do it for you:

Hasty generalization fallacy. This is the worst attempt at science. False. Don't make spurious accusations. Nonsense. Wow. Your claim is wrong. I am not impressed. You're cherry picking. Appeal to Motive fallacy. Anecdotal. Not even close. That's a nice fairy tale. I have no idea what you're talking about at this point.

There you have it. If you strip away his pointless walls of text, these are pretty much all you gonna get.

You're getting really good at this

[GlockN'Roll]

From what I read, heard from Dr's and heard on podcast, these deaths are somewhat vetted, unlike VAERS death reports.

This is evil that these EUA shots are being forced on people against the Nuremberg Code and the US Federal Common Rule.

People will burn in hell for this.

[GimpsUnlimited]

Here, I will do it for you:

Hasty generalization fallacy. This is the worst attempt at science. False. Don't make spurious accusations. Nonsense. Wow. Your claim is wrong. I am not impressed. You're cherry picking. Appeal to Motive fallacy. Anecdotal. Not even close. That's a nice fairy tale. I have no idea what you're talking about at this point.

There you have it. If you strip away his pointless walls of text, these are pretty much all you gonna get.

[Rottentofu]

You're getting really good at this

It's really not hard. He merely makes his posts look intelligent by using technical terms. I have seen many of my staff do that. Once you dissect into his posts you will see that they are nothing more than a bunch of regurgitated junk. Its sad that some people still see to him as a good source of information.

[Scota4570]

To me it looks pretty awful. IT appears to me that a serious adverse outcome from the shot is much more likely that the change of a serious problem due to covid, for the general population. If you get the shot you are at risk base on the percentage shown. IF you avoid the shot you are at risk of death or serious problems if you get covid. At this point that is 700K (I think that is overstated but whatever) divided my 340 million times 100 or 0.2%. It must be remembered that the vast majority of those were dying of something else. So, We could easily cut that in half if we were being honest. Whatever.

Bottom line, I saw a lot of 2%+ risk of serious adverse event in the Pfizer document. 2% is greater than 0.2%.


I could be wrong. Confirmation bias is real. It appears obvious why they want to wait 50 years to release the data.

[XDJYo]

So terrible.

[jeffyhog]

Ok, I'm no math wizard, I'm getting almost a 3% fatality rate, is this right?

From the chart, 2.9% of adverse reactions resulted in death. I can't find how many vaccinations were done during that study, but I would guess it has to be in the millions. There is a (b) (4) footnote for number of vaccines shipped but I can't find the number.

Does anybody see the total number of vaccinations given during this timeframe?

[Deadon]

From the chart, 2.9% of adverse reactions resulted in death. I can't find how many vaccinations were done during that study, but I would guess it has to be in the millions. There is a (b) (4) footnote for number of vaccines shipped but I can't find the number.

Does anybody see the total number of vaccinations given during this timeframe?

From my understanding that number was redacted. Why I dunno? Why would the full contracts be completely redacted also? Meh just because gongwt your shots.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/attorney-releases-first-pages-subpoenaed-fda-files-shows-pfizer-documented-158893-adverse-events-25957-nervous-system-disorders/

[sd_shooter]

From the chart, 2.9% of adverse reactions resulted in death. I can't find how many vaccinations were done during that study, but I would guess it has to be in the millions. There is a (b) (4) footnote for number of vaccines shipped but I can't find the number.

Does anybody see the total number of vaccinations given during this timeframe?

From my understanding that number was redacted. Why I dunno? Why would the full contracts be completely redacted also? Meh just because gongwt your shots.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...tem-disorders/

The number of vaxxed is certainly important.

Bottom line is that there aren't very many dead from the vax. Is it still too many? IMO yes, but not enough to slow down the relentless political machine that has been set in motion. You'll see the demand more boosters rather than slowing down the vaccination.