Tweet
I mean they're still studying menstrual cycles. So what could go wrong?
-
-
Always looking for vintage Winchester and Marlin lever action rifles. Looking to sell? Know of one for sale? Drop me a line!
"Give a conservative a pile of bricks and you get a beautiful city. Give a leftist a city and you get a pile of bricks."Comment
-
Well, hell there ya go. I'm convinced. A website said my friends' experiences are not actually happening. Maybe they were just dreaming the whole thing? I'll go let them know that a website said what they are experiencing is not actually happening, and all those years of experience they have do not count for anything (unless they happen to get it on the "approved" website).Uh huh:
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
CONCLUSIONS
Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.
I know the NEJM (a top 5 medical journal) doesn't meet the same "standards" as steve kirsch.
Carry on.
Baghdad Balgor and the duracell guy know whats really up.vindicta inducit ad salutem?Comment
-
Actual Data, not Steve Kirsch's cousin's friend's mechanic's sister who is a nurse in Canada:
The stillbirth rate for vaccinated women who gave birth (3.35 per 1,000, 95%CI 2.71 to 4.15) was similar to the rate for unvaccinated women (3.60 per 1,000, 95%CI 3.40 to 3.81) giving birth between January and August 2021 (Figure 6).In the same period, the proportion of vaccinated women giving birth to babies with low birthweight (5.28%, 95%CI 5.01 to 5.57) was comparable tothe proportionfor unvaccinated women (5.36%, 95%CI 5.29 to 5.44)(Figure 7).Similarly, 0.93% (95%CI 0.82 to 1.06) of vaccinated pregnant women and 0.80% (95%CI 0.77 to 0.83) of unvaccinated pregnant womenhad a very low birthweight baby.Critical Thinking Skills:
Learn how to examine your sources and check for fake news or misleading facts.
https://libguides.royalroads.ca/criticalthinkingComment
-
IDK if an infant mortality rate is the same but it continues to decline in the United States through whatever time they have it recorded this year:
Year Infant Mortality Rate Growth Rate
2021 5.614 -1.180%
2020 5.681 -1.170%
2019 5.748 -1.150%1. Compared to what?
2. At what cost?
3. What hard evidence do you have?
T.S. debunking the Left in 3 simple questions.Comment
-
NEJM... NEJM... Wonder if they used surgisphere data for this study too...Uh huh:
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
CONCLUSIONS
Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.
I know the NEJM (a top 5 medical journal) doesn't meet the same "standards" as steve kirsch.Comment
-
... The liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:
* Creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
* Satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
* Augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
* Rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the governmentComment
-
Y’all read it here. “Actual data”. Boom. Facts.Actual Data, not Steve Kirsch's cousin's friend's mechanic's sister who is a nurse in Canada:
The stillbirth rate for vaccinated women who gave birth (3.35 per 1,000, 95%CI 2.71 to 4.15) was similar to the rate for unvaccinated women (3.60 per 1,000, 95%CI 3.40 to 3.81) giving birth between January and August 2021 (Figure 6).In the same period, the proportion of vaccinated women giving birth to babies with low birthweight (5.28%, 95%CI 5.01 to 5.57) was comparable tothe proportionfor unvaccinated women (5.36%, 95%CI 5.29 to 5.44)(Figure 7).Similarly, 0.93% (95%CI 0.82 to 1.06) of vaccinated pregnant women and 0.80% (95%CI 0.77 to 0.83) of unvaccinated pregnant womenhad a very low birthweight baby.
Well, at least the stuff they allowed to be written down…vindicta inducit ad salutem?Comment
-
Yes, yes, you got me:
"Nagase’s source for the Waterloo data is a provincial prosecutor (comparable to a State Attorney General) who in turn got the data from a nurse who works at the hospital." Totally well sourced and publically available!
"People that Nagase talked to in the past are now staying completely silent. Something has made them afraid to talk. That’s odd." OMG! THEY GOT TO THEM! It's gotta be the maple syrup mafia!
vs.
"UK Health Security Agency(UKHSA), formerly Public Health England (PHE),works closely with the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA), NHS England, and other government, devolved administration and academic partners to monitor the COVID-19 vaccination programme."
COVID-19 vaccine coverage in women before they give birth has increased as more women have become eligible for vaccination. In May 2021, only 2.8% of women giving birth had received at least 1dose of vaccine. This increased to9.8% of women who gave birth in June,16.0% in July and 22.2% in August 2021(Table 4).In the overall 8 month period between January and August 2021 a total of 355,299 women gave birth of whom 24,759 had received at least 1dose of COVID-19 vaccine prior to delivery. For the 18,187 women where enough information was available to derive the trimester in which the vaccine was administered, 695 (3.8%) were immunised with their earliest vaccine dose in pregnancy in their first trimester, 4,487 (24.7%) were immunised in their second trimester and 13,005 (71.5%) were immunised in their third trimester.Of all vaccinated women giving birth, 80.8% had received Pfizer vaccine, 11.1% had received AstraZeneca vaccine and 8.1% had received Moderna vaccine.
The whole report with data from a whole country demonstrates vaccines are safe and effective over and over again is definitely all lies, sigh... They have the audacity to publically list all their data too, the perfidy!
Clearly too, the New England Journal of Medicine is in on it too! Never ever trust that journal that every single doctor reads and trusts to choose treatment options for you and your family.Last edited by balgor; 12-11-2021, 12:31 PM.Critical Thinking Skills:
Learn how to examine your sources and check for fake news or misleading facts.
https://libguides.royalroads.ca/criticalthinkingComment
-
Uh huh:
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
CONCLUSIONS
Preliminaryfindings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.
I know the NEJM (a top 5 medical journal) doesn't meet the same "standards" as steve kirsch.
Seems to be a waste of snark,
that would be a perfectly reasonable preliminary conclusion. (from April)
Do you take issue with the follow up they advised?What do you call the people that abandoned the agenda of John Kennedy and adopted the agenda of Lee Oswald?
Pronouns: "Dude" and "Playa".
https://billstclair.com/Unintended-Consequences.pdf
I was born under a wandrin star.Comment
There are currently 6140 users online. 32 members and 6108 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.
Comment